TML fan said:
I'm not ignoring anything. There is not enough evidence to convict her. That doesn't mean she wasnt involved. It just means they can't prove it. If they already had their man, why did they continue to go after her? Why was her story full of holes? There is more than enough reason to mistrust her but not enough to convict her.
And Manson, if you think you have all the facts you're pretty naive. I never said she should have been found guilty. I said I think she did it because of all the inconsistencies in her defense. I believe she is lying.
You're ignoring the overwhelming evidence of the crime scene. There is no trace of her being there, in a crime scene that would have had tons of proof of whoever was there, just like there is tons of proof of Rudy Guede being there. The room was an ABSOLUTE blood bath.
So no, it doesn't just mean they can't prove if she was there, it means she wasn't there. Clearly, you're not comprehending this.
The prosecution continued their "witchhunt" because the prosecutor Guiliano Mignini is corrupt. He was part of the corrupt interrogation and was the lead prosecutor in court (which you've been told already). He was more concerned with saving his own career and winning the case because it was his own theory that there were 4 people involved in this satanic sex orgy gone wrong. He's done this exact same thing before in a previous case, with the exact same motive and lost and was completely embarassed... First he said the motive was a satanic sex orgy (sounds believable right?), then when that was thrown out, he changed the motive to revenge due to "a rage caused by smoking marijuana" (again, very believeable), then that was disproven, so he changed the motive to a financial motive, again disproven, so he finally said with today's violence, there doesn't have to be a motive. He was absolutely determined to find a way to convict them, even without a motive or evidence. He was just determined to win the argument for his own selfish interests. Sounds like you might get along well together.
You've already been explained, in detail, why her story was "full of holes"...you're cleary not reading these posts. The interrogation was incredibly corrupt...re-read the posts, I'm not re-posting.
You keep say you're reading everything but you keep asking the same questions.
At least read Wikipedia ffs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher#Prosecution_and_defence_arguments