GhostofPotvin29
New member
pnjunction said:I think it comes down to the 5 on 3. That is a golden chance to move the puck around, screen the goalie and get quality chances that are hard or impossible to save. Instead Miller got visibility on long shots.
If we didn't have the long 5 on 3 I might agree we were powerless to take this game from Miller.
Even on that there were a number of good, hard screened shots (one hit Miller in the shoulder I think) and one that rang off the post or crossbar. I thought they had a number of real good chances that you might expect one of which to go in typically.