13th fan said:
Most likely the cost are up and the revenues are down but what stops the decline of the radio listeners when they let go one of their long time radio personality . I guess the writing was on the wall when Beyak left.
Well, as long as whoever they bring in to replace him does close to the same job, less people will care about losing a long time personality than you think. At the end of the day, the product is still the Leafs, and that hasn't changed. Radio broadcasts are still going to attract a similar number of people next season as they did this season - which is still not all that many, with the increase in things like satellite radio and PVRs, etc, that weren't really around 10 years ago or as prevalent 5 years ago.
I also had the chance to talk to someone who is close to Jim, and the way he said things went down was that, before this season, Leafs radio broadcasts didn't have a producer in the booth. This year they did, and there were some clashes in terms of style (not in terms of content, though - this isn't about Rogers/Bell wanting a puppet or anything like that). They'd also apparently received a number of complaints about the way Jim would insert his colour commentary during the play, which would sometimes mean the action on the ice would get lost/be missed. On top of the likely money issue, Rogers and Bell want a more traditional setup in their broadcasts - the play-by-play guy gets the vast majority of the air time while the action is on, and the colour guy contributes mostly between whistles and in the intermissions, etc. That's how just about everyone else does it, any way.