• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Leafs @ Panthers - Dec. 28th, 5:00pm - SNO, TSN 1050

What a lazy team.  They didn't even make an effort to try and stop that empty net goal.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Ugh. This one sounds like it was a total collapse.

Nah...like most games, the Leafs were outplayed the whole game.  I don't really think that deserves to be considered a collapse. The Panthers chances just started finding the back of the net.
 
L K said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Ugh. This one sounds like it was a total collapse.

Nah...like most games, the Leafs were outplayed the whole game.  I don't really think that deserves to be considered a collapse. The Panthers chances just started finding the back of the net.

Ok. Glad I had to miss it then
 
Tomorrow night will be interesting. Does Reimer go again or will Christopher Gibson make his NHL debut against Stamkos and company?
 
TheMightyOdin said:
Arn said:
Leafs were lucky to be in the game at all in all honesty.

Being up by two goals in the third is more than being in the game. You got to win those. Unfortunately  I know what you mean.

Yeah I more meant after the first where they were outshot 14-4 or whatever before they somehow scored 4 goals in 6 shots then went back to sucking.
 
Patrick said:
Yes, but was Jay lying?

Would you have voted guilty?

Do you think he is innocent?

Do you believe the innocence project will be successful in their motion to test the DNA evidence?


1. Pretty clearly about something anyway. He told, like, four different stories to the police. On the stand? I think it's pretty clear his testimony doesn't match with the timeline of the murder.

2. No, I don't think they had anywhere near enough evidence to convict him.

3. Nah. I sort of am with Dana with the idea that there just seems like too many coincidences that add up to either him being guilty or him being almost comically unlucky. None of the alternate theories seem compelling and Jay knowing where the car was seems to be the only real piece of evidence there is and, well, that points pretty clearly to Adnan.

4. Maybe, but I'd guess that the testing will result in inconclusive results. I think he's in jail for good.
 
3 goals on 5 shots that period, it's not like it was a function of the Panthers dominating.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Patrick said:
Yes, but was Jay lying?

Would you have voted guilty?

Do you think he is innocent?

Do you believe the innocence project will be successful in their motion to test the DNA evidence?


1. Pretty clearly about something anyway. He told, like, four different stories to the police. On the stand? I think it's pretty clear his testimony doesn't match with the timeline of the murder.

2. No, I don't think they had anywhere near enough evidence to convict him.

3. Nah. I sort of am with Dana with the idea that there just seems like too many coincidences that add up to either him being guilty or him being almost comically unlucky. None of the alternate theories seem compelling and Jay knowing where the car was seems to be the only real piece of evidence there is and, well, that points pretty clearly to Adnan.

4. Maybe, but I'd guess that the testing will result in inconclusive results. I think he's in jail for good.

Yeah, pretty much where I'm at too.

The one "theory" I heard that was at least somewhat conceivable was that the cops fed Jay a bunch of the info in the pre-interview. Apparently at least one of the cops was forced to retire after being found to cook evidence.

It's a stretch, but it's likely the only scenario in which things can be explained and it'll never be proven.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top