Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kessel Run said:It's also very likely that this is only to give Rielly his 9 games or so, and he will be back after that. The 925K they save by having Liles in the minors is less than Rielly's cap hit isn't it?
mr grieves said:Busta seems to know all the CBA stuff, but my understanding is that the cap clearingest move would've been to compliance buyout Grabo and Liles for $5.5m + 3.85m, and then regular buyout the last year of Komi's contract, which turns his $4.5m cap hit for the 2013-14 season into a $1.5m cap hit for the next two. That seems to clear about $12.4m in cap space, instead of the $10m that the Grabo & Komi buyouts did. On the other hand, I've not had much luck figuring out cap savings today -- so who knows?
mr grieves said:But what's the deal with Liles? Will the $2.95m hit remain on the cap for next 3 seasons that he's under contract and buried?
13th fan said:Wow another ex Avalanche defenceman goes bust , Finger and now Liles . Nonis, note to self ,3rd time is the charm
CarltonTheBear said:Kessel Run said:It's also very likely that this is only to give Rielly his 9 games or so, and he will be back after that. The 925K they save by having Liles in the minors is less than Rielly's cap hit isn't it?
There's still a few things working against Liles in his return to the NHL. First, we really don't have any idea whether or not the Leafs will keep Rielly up for the full season. If he sticks, the Leafs have 7 NHL defencemen and we likely won't ever see them carry an 8th until injuries hit.
If Rielly is sent down and Liles is called up, he'll still be behind 6 NHL defencemen and probably a regular healthy scratch unless Carlyle goes crazy and starts benching Gardiner again. But sitting in the press box for an extended period of time probably hurts his trade value more than playing in the AHL does.
And even if Rielly gets sent down and the Leafs choose to carry 7 defencemen, it would make more sense for them cap-wise to call-up Brennan instead of Liles. That would give them an extra $325k in cap space, which could go a long way. Again, neither will likely play if the other defencemen are healthy so it just makes more sense to carry the cheapest possible option for emergencies. The 7th guy could even see himself get bounced to and from the AHL during home games or off days to give the Leafs even more relief.
Deebo said:He cleared waivers, no surprise.
I know they're decent players . I guess my point is that our track record with ex Avalanche player hasn't been good and I totally forgot about O'Byrne ;DZanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:13th fan said:Wow another ex Avalanche defenceman goes bust , Finger and now Liles . Nonis, note to self ,3rd time is the charm
For the record, in no way was Finger a bust. Far from it. He was perfectly serviceable. He just got paid 2x more than he should have. Nor is Liles anything like a bust. For that matter, neither was O'Byrne. All of these guys played to a reasonable level.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:13th fan said:Wow another ex Avalanche defenceman goes bust , Finger and now Liles . Nonis, note to self ,3rd time is the charm
For the record, in no way was Finger a bust. Far from it. He was perfectly serviceable. He just got paid 2x more than he should have. Nor is Liles anything like a bust. For that matter, neither was O'Byrne. All of these guys played to a reasonable level.
princedpw said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:13th fan said:Wow another ex Avalanche defenceman goes bust , Finger and now Liles . Nonis, note to self ,3rd time is the charm
For the record, in no way was Finger a bust. Far from it. He was perfectly serviceable. He just got paid 2x more than he should have. Nor is Liles anything like a bust. For that matter, neither was O'Byrne. All of these guys played to a reasonable level.
No, O'Byrne was a bust. Not NHL-level player.