• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Matt Martin signs with the Leafs [4 years, $2.5mil AAV]

Frank E said:
Oh come on...they didn't have any sandpaper.  They needed this. He's not Colton Orr.

We're going to have a 4th liner on the books for 4 years at $2.5mil. Sandpaper or not, that's not a good deal.
 
Too much money....too much term.  But in the grand scheme of things no big deal. 

Gonna have to chop off that sweet flow he's got going on
 
CarltonTheBear said:
We're going to have a 4th liner on the books for 4 years at $2.5mil. Sandpaper or not, that's not a good deal.

It's a deal that will be expiring and potentially valuable right when the Leafs are really going to need the space. Unless you plan on the Leafs being a max team in the next couple years, which is pretty unlikely, cap concerns seem pretty minimal.
 
McGarnagle said:
Babcock never has had much use in the past for these guys, why now?

He's more of a grinder than a goon. Babcock hasn't typically iced goons but 4th liners with a little grit? He's had them.
 
I get that the contract isn't a complete anchor, but this deal just basically adds to a list of things I haven't been crazy about lately. In the last few weeks we've (in my opinion):

1) Overpaid for an unproven starting goalie, both in terms of assets required to get him and in the contract terms
2) Had a draft that focused largely on two things: overage players and size
3) Was one of the few teams to spark Stamkos' interest in a serious sense, so clearly their offer was legit (the pros and cons of this have been discussed enough though really)
4) Targeted two players on July 1st that address things like size, experience, and grit (Martin and Russell)

If you go back to last summer none of those things happened or would have happened. It's just an odd shift that I'm a little worried about.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I get that the contract isn't a complete anchor, but this deal just basically adds to a list of things I haven't been crazy about lately. In the last few weeks we've (in my opinion):

1) Overpaid for an unproven starting goalie, both in terms of assets required to get him and in the contract terms
2) Had a draft that focused largely on two things: overage players and size
3) Was one of the few teams to spark Stamkos' interest in a serious sense, so clearly their offer was legit (the pros and cons of this have been discussed enough though really)
4) Targeted two players on July 1st that address things like size, experience, and grit (Martin and Russell)

If you go back to last summer none of those things happened or would have happened. It's just an odd shift that I'm a little worried about.

I largely agree.  This, along with the draft after Matthews, makes me wonder how far Lamoriello really is from Burke's lineup vision.
 
Is this probably roughly what our line-up looks like right now?

JVR-Kadri-_____
_____-Bozak-Nylander
Komarov-Matthews-_____
Martin-Laich-_____

Sprinkle in Brown, Hyman, Soshnikov, Rychel, Marner, Michalek, Holland, Greening, Lupul.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Is this probably roughly what our line-up looks like right now?

JVR-Kadri-_____
_____-Bozak-Nylander
Komarov-Matthews-_____
Martin-Laich-_____

Sprinkle in Brown, Hyman, Soshnikov, Rychel, Marner, Michalek, Holland, Greening, Lupul.

That is my one real question going forward. The logjam looks out of control. We're not even talking about a guy like Leipsic being on the team after a really great AHL year.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I get that the contract isn't a complete anchor, but this deal just basically adds to a list of things I haven't been crazy about lately. In the last few weeks we've (in my opinion):

1) Overpaid for an unproven starting goalie, both in terms of assets required to get him and in the contract terms
2) Had a draft that focused largely on two things: overage players and size
3) Was one of the few teams to spark Stamkos' interest in a serious sense, so clearly their offer was legit (the pros and cons of this have been discussed enough though really)
4) Targeted two players on July 1st that address things like size, experience, and grit (Martin and Russell)

If you go back to last summer none of those things happened or would have happened. It's just an odd shift that I'm a little worried about.

I largely agree.  This, along with the draft after Matthews, makes me wonder how far Lamoriello really is from Burke's lineup vision.

Takes all types to build a team.  Skill, speed, size, grit....
 
Nik the Trik said:
That is my one real question going forward. The logjam looks out of control. We're not even talking about a guy like Leipsic being on the team after a really great AHL year.

And guys like Hyman, Soshnikov, and Brown are all players that Babcock seems to legitimately like, so I don't think he's going to give a veteran a spot just because they're veterans. I don't remember a time we've ever had that many potential NHL forwards coming into a training camp.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Is this probably roughly what our line-up looks like right now?

JVR-Kadri-Brown
Soshnikov-Bozak-Nylander
Komarov-Matthews-Marner
Martin-Laich-Hyman

That's probably what I would LIKE to see.

edit: Swapped Sosh and Hyman because of handedness.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
And guys like Hyman, Soshnikov, and Brown are all players that Babcock seems to legitimately like, so I don't think he's going to give a veteran a spot just because they're veterans. I don't remember a time we've ever had that many potential NHL forwards coming into a training camp.

At this point you have to figure we'll see multiple trades.
 
I don't hate the AAV. It's a little high, but, not excessively. Having a $2M-$2.5M 4th line winger isn't the end of the world if you've spent efficiently elsewhere.

The term, however? No reason to commit to this type of player for more than 2 seasons. I recognize that would have meant he would have signed elsewhere, but, that's also not a big loss.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top