OldTimeHockey
Active member
I wonder what you get for a Randy Macho Man elbow to the head from the top turn buckle? 6?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Scrif said:Thornton will get between 4 and 10 games MAX. He is a Bruin. Honestly wont be surprised if he doesn't get less. The league may likely say 'we need to revisit the rules' like they did with the Pacioretty and Miller hit.
Nik the Trik said:Scrif said:Thornton will get between 4 and 10 games MAX. He is a Bruin. Honestly wont be surprised if he doesn't get less. The league may likely say 'we need to revisit the rules' like they did with the Pacioretty and Miller hit.
The in-person hearing means the minimum is 5 games.
Nik the Trik said:The in-person hearing means the minimum is 5 games.
bustaheims said:Nik the Trik said:The in-person hearing means the minimum is 5 games.
No, it doesn't. It just means the league has the option of going longer than 5 games.
Nik the Trik said:Oh. I'd heard it the other way.
Bates said:I am in no way condoning the attack on Orpik but that seems to be a lot of damage for what looked like a minor jab. Guess he must have caught him just wrong with the head shots??? These incidents, although rare, sure make the sport look terrible.
Bates said:I have lost all interest in the trained gladiator(goon) bouts but still enjoy the heat of the moment battle between regular players.
mc said:They should ban hitting.
After every clean body crushing hit, the player who initiated the hit, has to drop his gloves. Whether he is a fighter or not. This is what hockey has come to.
In the NFL, when a wide receiver gets hit after a catch up the middle, the hitter taunts him lol but nobody does anything. The next down is played usually right after.
Hockey, no. A big melee happens. Usually penalties are assessed. Someone gets hurt or someone has a bounty on his head.
oldman said:I think the problem you may find is without some policing on the ice with your rougher 4th liner (you call them goon, heavy, what have you) there is more hacking and slashing in the game. When you have your Crosby, Kessel or Kane out injured because an opposing player crushed or slashed him so hard he has a broken bone(s) you may think different. Before you know it players start taking liberties on your star players because they know they don't have to answer the bell.
Imagine Gretzky out there without Semenko.
Love them or hate them they do have a roll in the game.
Bullfrog said:Bates said:I have lost all interest in the trained gladiator(goon) bouts but still enjoy the heat of the moment battle between regular players.
There's where I'm at, and have been for a long time. I go even further though and would fully enjoy hockey with no fighting at all.
From a logical perspective, I just can't rationalize punching someone full force with bare fists in the context of a game. I mean, I'm not naive, I understand the emotional side, I understand the cheap shots, the competitiveness, etc. It's certainly more complicated than just saying, fighting shouldn't exist. But when you start look at other contact sports like basketball, football, and baseball even, you have to ask, why not?
Nik the Trik said:oldman said:I think the problem you may find is without some policing on the ice with your rougher 4th liner (you call them goon, heavy, what have you) there is more hacking and slashing in the game. When you have your Crosby, Kessel or Kane out injured because an opposing player crushed or slashed him so hard he has a broken bone(s) you may think different. Before you know it players start taking liberties on your star players because they know they don't have to answer the bell.
Imagine Gretzky out there without Semenko.
Love them or hate them they do have a roll in the game.
It certainly seems like I say this every time the subject comes up but that really has no basis in fact. Not only are there lots of hockey leagues without fighting where star players aren't regularly slashed without consequence but the idea that a fighter is necessary to protect your star players is not something that owes itself to hockey tradition. Before the 70's teams had players who could fight, sure, but they never had guys who could do nothing but.