Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Britishbulldog said:So am I the only one here thinking that Phaneuf should not have been re-signed 7 years at $7 MIL a year?? What about oft-injured Lupul for 5 years and $26 MIL?? Bozak at $21 MIL?? I thought the general consensus is that Nonis over paid on all the players he saw as a core including the UFAs.
I don't believe that I am wrong.
Britishbulldog said:So am I the only one here thinking that Phaneuf should not have been re-signed 7 years at $7 MIL a year?? What about oft-injured Lupul for 5 years and $26 MIL?? Bozak at $21 MIL?? I thought the general consensus is that Nonis over paid on all the players he saw as a core including the UFAs.
I don't believe that I am wrong.
Britishbulldog said:So in the end Nonis's legacy can be rated as:
- Half Decent to Great trades (which should be the responsibilities of the Pro Scouts)
- Bad UFA signings above $1.5 MIL (which should be the responsibilities of the Pro Scouts)
- Half Decent drafting (which should be the responsibilities of the Amateur Scouts)
- Bad Buyouts (which should be the responsibilities of the Capologist)
- Re-Signings of Leaf RFA and UFA players are arguably market value or better which is Half Decent to Good.
I wonder why the Pro Scouts could assess talent in the trades but not be able to recognize the bad UFA signings that even fans could see. I guess it could be argued that none of the trades since Matthew Lombardi were for top 6 forwards or top pairing dmen. That kind of keeps the bar low.