J
Jalili
Guest
Hopefully Gardiner is with us for good now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I'll just say, a win on Weds and I'll count the series as a positive no matter what the outcome. We're holding our own against a much more experienced team with a top-notch D corps. The score doesn't indicate it but our effort tonight was way above Game 1.
CarltonTheBear said:L K said:Gardiner had a great game. Mistakes for sure but he's been dominant with the rush at times.
Him and Franson looked incredible in the third when they got paired together. It's too bad it took Carlyle 50 games to break up that Fraser-Franson pairing. I know they looked good at first, but everybody knew why (they were playing against the weakest opposition). Fraser just can't keep up with the top players.
Bonsixx said:The roller-coaster reaction on here is hilarious. It's why I never usually post until after the game.
Tonight's loss was a combination of Rask outplaying Reimer, and the Leafs beating themselves with insanely bad turnovers and puck management. The giveaways are killing them.
The bright side, the Leafs have now hung with the Bruins two out of three games. I no longer have a sense of dread about playing the Bruins, but that being said, I don't think the Leafs have what it takes to win this series. At least not from what I've seen so far.
Bozak is struggling on the draw, y'know, when the linesman actually lets him take it, which is unfortunate because he's apparently the only centre capable of winning them at all. Kadri is absolutely invisible, when he's not making terrible decisions. Remember how everyone thought he was a superstar a few months ago? Yeah, that's probably not happening, but he can still be an effective player. Right now, however, he is not. He's a liability.
Hopefully they can muster up a stronger puck possession game in Game 4, otherwise this thing is lights out.
Still, playoff hockey is pretty fun!
Nik the Trik said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I'll just say, a win on Weds and I'll count the series as a positive no matter what the outcome. We're holding our own against a much more experienced team with a top-notch D corps. The score doesn't indicate it but our effort tonight was way above Game 1.
Congratulations. You've managed to find the light grey-ish lining to this dark cloud.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Seriously, I agree with Andy007's analysis, which is bang on. Last night's game was one of those ones that could have easily gone to OT had a couple of breaks gone our way. We were not outplayed by a country mile or anything of the sort.
Rebel_1812 said:playoff stats:
Mikhail Grabovski 3 0 1 1 -4
Nikolai Kulemin 3 0 1 1 -5
Clarke MacArthur 1 0 0 0 0
I would miss any of these guys if the aren't back next year. Please stop talking about Grabbo like he is the best player on our team, because he isn't. One assist and a minus 4. Thats pretty bad.
RedLeaf said:I can't help thinking that the Leafs could really, really use another experienced D-man like Paul Ranger in the lineup.
It's too bad they couldn't sign him to a Leaf contract this season. He's got playoff experience and could help rid us of some of the costly mistakes we are seeing from the likes of O'Byrne and Fraser. Hopefully they can sign him in the offseason
Zee said:RedLeaf said:I can't help thinking that the Leafs could really, really use another experienced D-man like Paul Ranger in the lineup.
It's too bad they couldn't sign him to a Leaf contract this season. He's got playoff experience and could help rid us of some of the costly mistakes we are seeing from the likes of O'Byrne and Fraser. Hopefully they can sign him in the offseason
Yeah he'd look good with the Leafs, but wasn't there some sort of thing where he'd have to clear waivers before the Leafs could have called him up? Would have lost him at that point.
RedLeaf said:I think the issue was that Ranger didn't want to play in the NHL this year. I hope he'll change his mind for next season. It would really help shore up the defense.
bustaheims said:RedLeaf said:I think the issue was that Ranger didn't want to play in the NHL this year. I hope he'll change his mind for next season. It would really help shore up the defense.
It was both. He doesn't want to the return to the NHL right now for personal reasons, and, on top of that, if he were signed to an NHL contract mid-season, he would have had to clear waivers - even if the Leafs intended to keep him with the Marlies.
drummond said:Rebel_1812 said:playoff stats:
Mikhail Grabovski 3 0 1 1 -4
Nikolai Kulemin 3 0 1 1 -5
Clarke MacArthur 1 0 0 0 0
I would miss any of these guys if the aren't back next year. Please stop talking about Grabbo like he is the best player on our team, because he isn't. One assist and a minus 4. Thats pretty bad.
MacArthur is most probably gone, not sure about Grabbo, but Kulemin is a keeper. If they let him go - as you suggest - they would spent the whole summer trying to replace him and would come up with less effective and most likely brutally overpaid alternative. What he brings to the table is not neccesarily measured by amount of goals/points scored.
Btw. using your methodology, everyone with less than 2 points, which is 3/4 of the team, should be sent packing... such as Phaneuf, Gunnarsson, Kadri, Frattin, McCLement, they are all also minus players with one or even no assist...