leafplasma
New member
Wow, unreal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RedLeaf said:And that is why the Leafs should have met the Habs in round 1.
Bates said:No idea how NHL decides anything these days???
Check out the 1:10 mark. If that's not kicking the puck in???
http://video.tsn.ca/?dl=main/latest/1/0/921803/clip/536
As a comparable here is a goal that would have kept Wild out of playoffs. 1:27 mark
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/...#id=2382099072
Zee said:Bates said:No idea how NHL decides anything these days???
Check out the 1:10 mark. If that's not kicking the puck in???
http://video.tsn.ca/?dl=main/latest/1/0/921803/clip/536
As a comparable here is a goal that would have kept Wild out of playoffs. 1:27 mark
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/...#id=2382099072
Could have been called back but the Sens player attempted to play the puck with his stick, it actually touches his stick, and he's also stopping at the same time otherwise he'd crash right into Price if he keeps staking. In the process of stopping he "accidentally on purpose" directed the puck in. His foot doesn't change direction as a kicking motion, it's a stopping motion. It was a split second play, of course slowing it down on super-slo mo makes it look worse, but he was using his feet to stop.
Edit: your link to the 2nd goal isn't working.
bustaheims said:The more replays I watch, the more I see it as a good goal. The foot moves, yes, but mostly out of momentum than anything else. There's no "distinct kicking motion" there, and, on top of that, if he has the skill to put the puck off his stick and off his foot intentionally like he did there, than he deserves the goal.