Justin said:
Sure, the Raptors don't match up well against teams like Miami or Chicago but what about the bad teams we've squandered 4th quarter leads to?
There are different kinds of bad teams. The Raptors, for instance, are a team without a star or a real go-to guy but who have decent depth. Teams like Cleveland or Philadelphia, on the other hand, have guys in Irving and Holliday who they're comfortable giving the ball to in crunch time and letting them take over.
I know that you want to invent some sort of deeper meaning to what happens in the fourth quarter but the reality is that the only thing that losing by 3 after leading in the fourth means, as opposed to leading at any other time before ultimately losing by 3 in the fourth, is that when the chips are down the Raptors don't have anyone whose individual play can carry them. We knew that going in though.
Justin said:
No matter who's on the floor you should be able to hold a big lead
I'm sorry, but that just doesn't sound like something that reveals a particularly deep understanding of how the game of basketball works. Teams going on runs are common regardless in every quarter and it's entirely about who's on the court. The reason one team is better than another, which determines how many points they score, is who's on the floor.
The Raptors are losing because when things matter most, their guys aren't as good as the opposition.
Justin said:
and it's Casey's job to see to it that the players are motivated.
You keep saying that but it's really not true. A coach's job is to develop game plans and execute them. It's to manage the on-court game. It's to teach his players a system and get them to implement it. It's to draw up plays and give defensive assignments and dozens of other things that are more relevant than "motivating" well paid professionals.
Ultimately, Casey's job is to get the most out of the roster he's been given. Looking over the roster as it is, I don't really see how anyone could argue that they should be significantly ahead of where they are.