Nik the Trik said:
pmrules said:
In all seriousness, its a nice way to accumulate assets - i'm surprised it doesn't happen more often. Given the severe mismanagement of assets this franchise has endured over the past decade, this would be ok in my books (esp if Franson is in your plans for the future).
I think you're maybe underestimating what it means for a player to have an expiring contract. Even if a team goes to a player like Franson and lays out their trade and re-sign plan they're still telling him that while they think he's valuable, they don't think he's so valuable that they wouldn't risk losing him for whatever he could return in a trade. At that point, I think it's pretty understandable for a player to wonder if that situation is really the best one for him.
well obviously...there is risk on both sides...it all depends on how it is sold to the player?
Nonis: Hey Franson we want to offer you $X by X years...we think you are an important part of our future.
Franson - Yes I like that deal. I bleed blue and white.
Nonis - But as you know...this team sucks garbage. We need more assets...how would you like to get a shot at a few playoff rounds while we get a few assets back in return for you. This offer is waiting for you on July 1. Hopefully by then we would have made the moves and drafted players where you find coming back here more palatable, and help you to succeed here when you return. And obviously, we are taking a risk here as well since if you do well in the playoffs, its likely you will get a better offer on July 1...all that we ask is give us a chance to match, just like we would ordinarily. We value you...blah blah blah...
In all seriousness, if he's going to get "hurt" by that...he probably can't survive in a market like Toronto to begin with. Its business. I don't see Franson as one of those types. Worse come worse, we got assets for the expiring contract regardless.