GhostofPotvin29
New member
Mike Richards on waivers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CarltonTheBear said:Crazy. Lombardi could have used a compliance buyout on him last summer but didn't basically out of loyalty.
bustaheims said:Real_ESPNLeBrun: Expectation is that if Richards clears waivers tomorrow he'll be re-assigned to AHL Manchester. Unless of course Kings can work out a trade
mayorNHL: From what I've gathered, #LAKings were working on multiple deals to trade Richards over the weekend. Final one fell through late last night.
TSNBobMcKenzie: TOR/CGY believed to be teams talking recently to LA about Richards trade. Guessing Leafs/Flames were trying to move their bad contracts.
Honestly, unless they're willing to trade him straight up for Clarkson, I don't think there's a deal to be made there around the league. He's really fallen off that much.
Potvin29 said:If it was Clarkson, says a lot that the Kings would rather go this route than take that on.
bustaheims said:Potvin29 said:If it was Clarkson, says a lot that the Kings would rather go this route than take that on.
Maybe, but, at the same time, I totally understand them wanting to see if they can get rid of him without having to take on salary before making that kind of deal. If it wasn't for the NMC, I imagine the Leafs would do the same thing in this situation with Clarkson.
@CorsiHL
Just going to put this out there - 5v5 PTS/60 for this season:
Mike Richards: 1.27
Tyler Bozak: 1.25
David Clarkson: 1.24
Madferret said:Mike Richards for free...I don't think that helps teams trying to move their overrated or injury prone players leading up to the deadline very much. Colin Greening is probably breathing a little easier now tho
Bender said:Apparently it was Richards and Toffoli for Phaneuf. I don't know why we would trade bad contracts so we can get a youthful player packaged in. It seems detrimental overall.
Bender said:Apparently it was Richards and Toffoli for Phaneuf. I don't know why we would trade bad contracts so we can get a youthful player packaged in. It seems detrimental overall.
Madferret said:Bender said:Apparently it was Richards and Toffoli for Phaneuf. I don't know why we would trade bad contracts so we can get a youthful player packaged in. It seems detrimental overall.
I think the reality of it all means the Leafs aren't going to be able to dump Phaneuf without taking back a bad contract or eating some of Phaneuf's term in a trade.
Most fans and the media have been dumping on Phaneuf for what seems like forever you don't honestly think the Leafs are going to get a great return for him in a trade do you?
#BellLet'sTalk
Heroic Shrimp said:Hey, it's a league where real-life GMs actually traded valuable assets for Scott Gomez, and even signed Bobby Ryan to a $50M contract.