herman
Well-known member
mr grieves said:I'd like to see Babcock give up on the checking/match-up line and just roll trios that have talent enough to score and enough defensive acumen not get burned going the other way.
So gimme:
Hyman - Tavares - Marner (it's working so far, Hyman's speed and ability to disrupt defensemen is all Tavares and Marner seem to need to work)
Marleau - Matthews - Kapanen (Mathews can do a lot on his own, including (this season) get through the NZ and into the OZ; Kapanen has skill and speed enough to do that, plus the wheels to get to and hands to recover the puck; and Marleau's a fine secondary scoring threat and responsible winger)
Johnsson/Lindholm - Kadri - Nylander (LW options, at least when/if Johnsson gets going, are good without the puck and defensively responsible, while both Kadri and Nylander can enter the zone, pass, and shoot -- a good rush combo)
And a 4th line that can do what the one we had in Dallas did in the 3rd period -- keep it a cycle going in the offensive zone and eat time. Between Lindholm (positionally sound), Ennis, Brown (quick, tenacious on the puck, though not great hands), Gauthier and Leivo (big bodies who showed they could sustain pressure), the Leafs have the players to do that.
I'm largely in agreement (roll them 4 lines because we're the scary ones). However, I do wonder about playstyle chemistry (lol).
It is oft-said that great players make the players around them better (Babcock recently said this of Toews, Crosby routinely elevates randos into household name status, the Islanders paid Tavares' linemates as if they were unaware of this effect...); I think there is also a case to be made that there are times when players are too great for their linemates and it hinders the whole line when the styles are too offset by that talent differential.
It works for the likes of Crosby and Tavares because their game and playstyle is largely lunchpail hockey, with dialed up puckhandling and finishing ability. It's easy to play with them if you're already a grinder who can skate and can just get to certain spots regularly.
With Matthews, it's very different. Even with Nylander when he was on the Marlies, there are highlight reels of players missing what Nylander was dishing because it was too fast, too slick, too unexpected. The pair of them gestaltly elevate one another like no one else on the team can, except maybe Marner. Kapanen is a very capable substitute on Matthews' wing (fast, right spots, plenty of skill, Euro-hockey style), but right now you're seeing him through the direct contrast to Tyler Ennis at an extremely small sample size to boot. I think this is a great opportunity for Kapanen to show the coaching staff what the Marlies already know, and that he's the real deal, but I think we're underselling Nylander's effect. Speaking from a 4D salary cap chess perspective, Kapanen is due for a raise and when Nylander's back, he's cost controlled.
Kadri-Nylander hasn't worked in the past that we've seen, although how much of that was Komarov on the opposite flank it's hard to say. I just think that if Nylander is not centering a line, the team is best served with him pseudo-centering Matthews. I like the eventual Johnsson - Kadri - Kapanen approach, as they're all going to get special teams minutes to offset being third fiddle to Matthews/Tavares.
Something extra weird to try if we want Matthews - Kapanen to live on:
Kadri - Tavares - Marner (Mark Hunter Special - shutdown + score a crapload)
Marleau - Matthews - Kapanen (working so far)
Johnsson - Nylander - Hyman (sheltered scoring, with the bonus of putting Hyman on his strong side = 20 goals probably)
Gauthier/Leivo - Lindholm/Gauthier - Brown