AtomicMapleLeaf
New member
Just noticed that we are the only to not to have a "loser" point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AtomicMapleLeaf said:Just noticed that we are the only to not to have a "loser" point.
Zee said:AtomicMapleLeaf said:Just noticed that we are the only to not to have a "loser" point.
That's cause we're not losers, we're winners.
Horrible trade. Steen and Cola for StempniakFrank E said:Was reading Friedman's 31 thoughts, and suggestion was that St. Louis was probably looking at changes...Parayko please...but anyways...Want to feel old? Steen was traded to the Blues in 08-09 at the 20 game mark.
That's 10 years ago.
That was an indefensible trade. Why the hell did we ever trade Steen? I never figured that out.Guilt Trip said:Horrible trade. Steen and Cola for StempniakFrank E said:Was reading Friedman's 31 thoughts, and suggestion was that St. Louis was probably looking at changes...Parayko please...but anyways...Want to feel old? Steen was traded to the Blues in 08-09 at the 20 game mark.
That's 10 years ago.
Frank E said:Was reading Friedman's 31 thoughts, and suggestion was that St. Louis was probably looking at changes...Parayko please...but anyways...Want to feel old? Steen was traded to the Blues in 08-09 at the 20 game mark.
That's 10 years ago.
Bender said:That was an indefensible trade. Why the hell did we ever trade Steen? I never figured that out.Guilt Trip said:Horrible trade. Steen and Cola for StempniakFrank E said:Was reading Friedman's 31 thoughts, and suggestion was that St. Louis was probably looking at changes...Parayko please...but anyways...Want to feel old? Steen was traded to the Blues in 08-09 at the 20 game mark.
That's 10 years ago.
Paul Maurice era?L K said:Bender said:That was an indefensible trade. Why the hell did we ever trade Steen? I never figured that out.Guilt Trip said:Horrible trade. Steen and Cola for StempniakFrank E said:Was reading Friedman's 31 thoughts, and suggestion was that St. Louis was probably looking at changes...Parayko please...but anyways...Want to feel old? Steen was traded to the Blues in 08-09 at the 20 game mark.
That's 10 years ago.
Coach didn?t like him and the interim GM was awful.
L K said:Coach didn?t like him and the interim GM was awful.
Bullfrog said:I might be misremembering, but I recall it being almost universally panned among fans. I know for me that including both Steen and Colaiacovo was something I couldn't understand, despite C's injury history.
Nik the Trik said:I know people are probably not that into talking about another contract negotiation but last night they were talking about the Leafs apparently having some optimism that Gardiner could get re-signed. Apparently the thinking is that a fairly small raise but with a fair chunk of upfront money and term might be a more workable solution than previously thought. They also talked about bribing a team to take Marleau as a pretty workable outcome. Given those two things I actually think the Leafs can do next year pretty well.
It would be tight but this roster would work
Johnsson-Matthews-Nylander
Hyman-Tavares-Marner
Grundstrom-Kadri-Kapanen
Marchment-Gauthier-Brown
Brooks
Rielly-Zaitsev
Dermott-Liljegren
Gardiner-Oz
Holl
Andersen
Fishbulb
A couple of notes:
- I have Marner at 9.5 here, Matthews at 12, Gardiner at 5, Kapanen at 3.5, Johnsson at 2, Oz at 1.5 and Sparks at 900k. I think most of those are pretty reasonable assuming Kapanen and Johnsson are short term deals
- I also have a 82 million cap
- I traded Marleau to San Jose with a 2020 2nd for a 2019 5th.
- The team is right up against it but if the team was looking to save a million here or there I think it would be around this time to start talking about whether we want to pay Connor Brown 2 million to be the 4th line RW.
Zee said:Marleau has to be willing to leave though, not sure if he wants to.
Zee said:Also he's very popular with Matthews and Marner, so you don't want to cause some sort of strife in the room.
Zee said:I mean everyone is professional and knows how the cap system works, but if the GM asks Marleau to waive his "in faith negotiated" NMC, he might be pissed off and it could rub off on the younger guys. You don't want a situation where the players feel like no-trades and no-movement clauses aren't worth the paper they're written on. Might be a small thing since they all know the situation but still should be a consideration.