• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs - General Discussion

CarltonTheBear said:
Guilt Trip said:
CarltonTheBear said:
The Johnsson/Marleau swap carries over, nice.
It needed to be done 2 weeks ago.

I mean you could say 2 months ago. But as long as it sticks going forward it doesn't really matter.

Basically this.

I don't think the team or Kapanen/Johnsson are any the worse (long term) for having to bust through Komarov/Marleau/Martin/Brown levels to claim their rightful spots. If anything it should be creating internal competition from both above and below the roster spot. Babcock might look married to Marleau and Komarov and Hainsey, etc. but the contract lengths tell the tale and these players are good in the room but played to be professional hurdles.

Sometimes Babcock is right about his assessment, and sometimes he's wrong. Carrick couldn't hurdle Polak, and currently still cannot on a new same team. That sucks. Leivo is semi-shining alongside the best players Vancouver has to offer but his path to the lineup was through Marner, Nylander, Kapanen, Brown. And Babcock is soooo stubborn that he... agreed to play Leivo every single game while Nylander was out so he would have a stronger body of work for the eventual trade when he had multiple opportunities to scratch him.

Some of us here seem happiest when there is something to kvetch about anyway, so win-win!
 
CarltonTheBear said:
https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1099008543116705795

He was on the receiving end of a pretty solid check on the 2nd Caps goal last night. Wouldn't surprise me if his back isn't great today.
 
You know, when we talk about next year and the cap crunch when ever I've talked about Marleau potentially not being here I've gotten a lot of "You're crazy! Marleau won't just walk away without a cup! He'll leave over his dead body!" but I think we're sort of approaching a scenario that would make it very possible that Marleau isn't around.

I don't think it'll happen, because of the respect he's got in the dressing room primarily, but right now if hockey operated somewhat more like Basketball where a few nights off wasn't seen as some sort of horribly insulting demotion then I think the team would be right to be rotating a younger player in to spell Marleau occasionally. He's looked a step behind some nights and while I think he's still a net positive, it's fair to say that we're coming towards the end of his career.

So it would be very reasonable for Marleau to be faced with the reality that next year, if he wants to stick around, he might not be in the lineup every night or even most nights. Is that how he's going to want to end his career? Is sticking around for a cup worth it if he's not dressing in the playoffs?

Call me crazy but I don't think he's going to want to go out like that. I think there's a very good chance he "retires" and lets the Leafs trade him to Phoenix or Ottawa or someplace that wants to hit the minimum.
 
That seems generally reasonable. The only thing is I don't see Marleau getting bad enough where he wouldn't at least earn a spot on the 4th line. He also strikes me as someone who's ego wouldn't be hurt by sticking around and contributing in a lesser role.

That said, he also seems like a pretty strong family man and might be more amenable to early retirement as you suggest.
 
Bullfrog said:
That seems generally reasonable. The only thing is I don't see Marleau getting bad enough where he wouldn't at least earn a spot on the 4th line. He also strikes me as someone who's ego wouldn't be hurt by sticking around and contributing in a lesser role.

That said, he also seems like a pretty strong family man and might be more amenable to early retirement as you suggest.


This is Babcock we're talking about, he won't be the coach that suddenly sits a hall of player player regardless of how poorly he plays.  He's stubborn as a mule and and Marleau has more than enough "real gud pro" points built up with Babcock
 
Bullfrog said:
That seems generally reasonable. The only thing is I don't see Marleau getting bad enough where he wouldn't at least earn a spot on the 4th line. He also strikes me as someone who's ego wouldn't be hurt by sticking around and contributing in a lesser role./quote]

Yeah, I don't think it's a matter of ego. I think a lot of great players have stepped away not because they'd literally gotten so bad they couldn't hang onto the roster but because they could no longer play at the level they expected of themselves.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Bullfrog said:
That seems generally reasonable. The only thing is I don't see Marleau getting bad enough where he wouldn't at least earn a spot on the 4th line. He also strikes me as someone who's ego wouldn't be hurt by sticking around and contributing in a lesser role.

Yeah, I don't think it's a matter of ego. I think a lot of great players have stepped away not because they'd literally gotten so bad they couldn't hang onto the roster but because they could no longer play at the level they expected of themselves.

The fact that he'd only be playing for a little over $1m over the season would probably contribute as well.
 
Frank E said:
Nik the Trik said:
Bullfrog said:
That seems generally reasonable. The only thing is I don't see Marleau getting bad enough where he wouldn't at least earn a spot on the 4th line. He also strikes me as someone who's ego wouldn't be hurt by sticking around and contributing in a lesser role.

Yeah, I don't think it's a matter of ego. I think a lot of great players have stepped away not because they'd literally gotten so bad they couldn't hang onto the roster but because they could no longer play at the level they expected of themselves.

The fact that he'd only be playing for a little over $1m over the season would probably contribute as well.

On the other hand, he has an incredible iron man streak going and is moving up on the all time games list. Both might encourage him to keep going.
 
princedpw said:
On the other hand, he has an incredible iron man streak going and is moving up on the all time games list. Both might encourage him to keep going.

That could go both ways though. If he's really into the Iron Man thing would he want to put his coach in the position of potentially ending it by healthy scratch instead of injury?
 
There's been some talk about how the Isles must be better coached than us so I'd just like to point out they're currently playing Matt Barzal with Leo Komarov and Tom Kuhnhackl.

edit: obviously they won this game 4-0 despite being outshot 36-23 and outcorsi'd 57-32.
 
https://theathletic.com/837419/2019/02/26/frederik-gauthier-trevor-moore-and-the-importance-of-the-leafs-unheralded-development-program/

On top of the work they already do on the Marlies side:
Evidently, Dubas believes there?s more that can be done. He?s looking, in particular, across the aisle of MLSE to what the Raptors have done.

?You see a lot of their younger players that are not necessarily high draft picks ? and basketball?s a little bit different because you basically have three or four guys that don?t play a minute every night so you can attribute more development time to them in season. I find that that?s a very interesting situation, because we have two or three guys every night that are scratches or injured. So we?ve talked a lot about that,? Dubas said in a 1-on-1 interview with The Athletic just before the start of the season. ?And we?ve done a lot of that with the Marlies, but that?s a development level. So can we do that here with the Leafs and different things like that have been the stuff that I?ve looked at with them.?

Justin Holl hasn't been idling in the pressbox, exactly. He's been receiving focused dev time in season to get him over-ready to play NHL defense when the time comes. He's one of the several cast offs whose tools put them on Dubas' radar and whose work helped elevate their games to the point of being NHL-useful. It's not the traditional route to the league, but for a cap-committed team like the Leafs, it's good to have a constant influx of freebies who have 1-3 season of peak that play above their league-minimum paygrade and can be spun off for assets down the road.
 
Hainsey-plus-minus.jpg


And who's worried about our defense?
 
Bullfrog said:
Hainsey-plus-minus.jpg


And who's worried about our defense?

Leafs need to score more than one goal and usually, they will. Averaging every other night for more than a month now. Half their D out or playing hurt (Muzzin).
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top