Zee said:I'm concerned that the Habs keep winning games. I want them to lose games.
I hate to break this to you, but Montreal's a safe bet to finish top-2 in the division. They've got a pretty good team there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zee said:I'm concerned that the Habs keep winning games. I want them to lose games.
CarltonTheBear said:Zee said:I'm concerned that the Habs keep winning games. I want them to lose games.
I hate to break this to you, but Montreal's a safe bet to finish top-2 in the division. They've got a pretty good team there.
CarltonTheBear said:Yikes. I've seen a few comments about Dubois looking like he's completely checked out.
herman said:CarltonTheBear said:Yikes. I've seen a few comments about Dubois looking like he's completely checked out.
The benching was justified on the face of it. But he's been playing well for them leading up to this game, so...
Habs are averaging almost 5 goals a game. Don't think that's sustainable.Zee said:I'm concerned that the Habs keep winning games. I want them to lose games.
See this is what I want to hear. You are an awesome guy!Guilt Trip said:Habs are averaging almost 5 goals a game. Don't think that's sustainable.Zee said:I'm concerned that the Habs keep winning games. I want them to lose games.
Disagree...that's a good hit. Head not targeted, chest was.L K said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8AX-dRh-jE
Myers with a high hit on Armia at the end of a game Vancouver was out of. Armia is out with a concussion and it looks like no supplemental discipline for Myers.
Even if the first point of contact isn't his head he drives the shoulder up thorugh the hit.
DOPS is useless.
Bullfrog said:By "good", you may mean legal.
I would argue it's not a good hit though. There's a high risk of injury on a hit like that and I think it should be against the rules.
Yup, it's a legal hit and not against the rules. Nothing wrong with it.Bullfrog said:By "good", you may mean legal.
I would argue it's not a good hit though. There's a high risk of injury on a hit like that and I think it should be against the rules.
Guilt Trip said:Disagree...that's a good hit. Head not targeted, chest was.L K said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8AX-dRh-jE
Myers with a high hit on Armia at the end of a game Vancouver was out of. Armia is out with a concussion and it looks like no supplemental discipline for Myers.
Even if the first point of contact isn't his head he drives the shoulder up thorugh the hit.
DOPS is useless.
I didn't make the rules and it wasn't against them so it was a good hit IMO and the NHL's also. You don't agree and that's ok.herman said:Guilt Trip said:Disagree...that's a good hit. Head not targeted, chest was.L K said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8AX-dRh-jE
Myers with a high hit on Armia at the end of a game Vancouver was out of. Armia is out with a concussion and it looks like no supplemental discipline for Myers.
Even if the first point of contact isn't his head he drives the shoulder up thorugh the hit.
DOPS is useless.
If you aren't trying to drive into a pedestrian but still happen to hit that person for some reason, it's no biggie? You can't measure intent, but you can measure results. The first point of contact stipulation is pretty stupid as far as health and safety of players goes. A high stick that clips a face after glancing off an arm is still a high stick.
Also, legal doesn't necessarily mean good and right.
Guilt Trip said:Your reference to hitting a pedestrian, ridiculous. What was I trying to hit with my vehicle when I accidentally nailed a pedestrian? Myers was intending to hit Armia after all.
herman said:https://twitter.com/bluejacketsnhl/status/1352699464218243074
You bet I counted the blinks for Morse code