OldTimeHockey
Active member
bustaheims said:OldTimeHockey said:bustaheims said:On a related note, Matt Murray has really just collapsed into awfulness, huh? I thought he'd rebound some getting the clear cut starting role in Ottawa, but, clearly, it's just made things worse for him so far. Lucky for the sens that they don't need the cap space for a couple years, because that contract is basically unmoveable.
I'm not overly high on Murray but playing behind that group of players makes it pretty tough to put up numbers.
That's certainly part of it, but Murray has been especially bad. Ottawa has the 2nd worst Sv% on scoring chances against (ironically, it's Pittsburgh that has the worst, but they allow a significant amount fewer) and the worst differential between expected goals against and actual goals against. Ottawa hasn't played well, but Murray's performance has been equally bad, if not worse.
I think Murray falls into the category of "he's really good because he won a cup". It got him a nice contract from the Senators.
I'm not sure why the Senators wanted a 6.25 million dollar goalie when the rest of the team was so sh*t in the first place. Seems like they're spending the money too early. I guess the good thing is he'll only be 29-30 at the end of his contract so his play shouldn't have dropped off too much by then....but, if it doesn't improve, like you said, how do you move him. you're not a team ready to start competing with a goalie that's preventing you from doing so.