azzurri63
Active member
herman said:https://twitter.com/markhmasters/status/1501210727184543753
Good to hear.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
herman said:https://twitter.com/markhmasters/status/1501210727184543753
hobarth said:RedLeaf said:While I agree a lot of the Leafs issues right now are related to the play of their D, clearly their goaltending is not of the same calibre it was earlier in the season.
Recently this thought keeps coming up in my head? can you imagine if not resigning Freddie Andersen becomes the ultimate undoing of Dubas?
It seemed to me that TO faced a lot of covid weakened opponents earlier in the year and the TO that we saw in the 1st period against Columbus was what TO looked to be earlier in the season but now that the teams are healthier even bad teams are making the Leafs look anemic.
It amazes me how bad TO can look, like losing to Pitts. back in Oct., 7-1 and Pitts. didn't have Crosby, Malkin and Letang. I can't imagine how useless TO would be without Matthews, Marner and Nylander or Brodie. I do know that Kerfoot isn't any sort of player that TO could rely on to replace any of those players and he's TO's 5 highest paid forward.
Joe S. said:RedLeaf said:While I agree a lot of the Leafs issues right now are related to the play of their D, clearly their goaltending is not of the same calibre it was earlier in the season.
Recently this thought keeps coming up in my head? can you imagine if not resigning Freddie Andersen becomes the ultimate undoing of Dubas?
This is again, based on the assumption that Andersen even wanted to come back. We don?t know if a contract was offered, and if it was he may have rejected it. We just don?t know the whole story.
Joe S. said:hobarth said:RedLeaf said:While I agree a lot of the Leafs issues right now are related to the play of their D, clearly their goaltending is not of the same calibre it was earlier in the season.
Recently this thought keeps coming up in my head? can you imagine if not resigning Freddie Andersen becomes the ultimate undoing of Dubas?
It seemed to me that TO faced a lot of covid weakened opponents earlier in the year and the TO that we saw in the 1st period against Columbus was what TO looked to be earlier in the season but now that the teams are healthier even bad teams are making the Leafs look anemic.
It amazes me how bad TO can look, like losing to Pitts. back in Oct., 7-1 and Pitts. didn't have Crosby, Malkin and Letang. I can't imagine how useless TO would be without Matthews, Marner and Nylander or Brodie. I do know that Kerfoot isn't any sort of player that TO could rely on to replace any of those players and he's TO's 5 highest paid forward.
I don?t understand these takes at all. Do you remove the core of the team and you?re shocked that they wouldn?t be as good? I don?t understand your point at all?
hobarth said:Joe S. said:hobarth said:RedLeaf said:While I agree a lot of the Leafs issues right now are related to the play of their D, clearly their goaltending is not of the same calibre it was earlier in the season.
Recently this thought keeps coming up in my head? can you imagine if not resigning Freddie Andersen becomes the ultimate undoing of Dubas?
It seemed to me that TO faced a lot of covid weakened opponents earlier in the year and the TO that we saw in the 1st period against Columbus was what TO looked to be earlier in the season but now that the teams are healthier even bad teams are making the Leafs look anemic.
It amazes me how bad TO can look, like losing to Pitts. back in Oct., 7-1 and Pitts. didn't have Crosby, Malkin and Letang. I can't imagine how useless TO would be without Matthews, Marner and Nylander or Brodie. I do know that Kerfoot isn't any sort of player that TO could rely on to replace any of those players and he's TO's 5 highest paid forward.
I don?t understand these takes at all. Do you remove the core of the team and you?re shocked that they wouldn?t be as good? I don?t understand your point at all?
My point, Pitts. won without it's core because it had/has quality players beyond the core, TO only has it's core which is too little to rely on in pressure situations like the playoffs like TO losing to Mtl. because Marner wasn't Marner, JT was injured and the quality of the backup players for TO is headlined by Kerfoot, due to pay, a now 4th liner.
Beyond TO's core there is little value as opposed to Pitts. who can beat TO with or without their core, that's my point.
L K said:Leading goals - Matthews 40; Guentzel 27
Leading assist - Rielly 39; Letting 43
Leading points - Matthews 72; Guentzel 57
Pittsburgh has 10 players with at least 20 points. The Leafs have 11 players with at least 20 points.
Pittsburgh has 8 players with at least 10 goals. The Leafs have 8 players with at least 10 goals.
Our 6-12 scorers: 113 points
Their 6-12 scorers: 104 points
I think Pittsburgh got this weird reputation for their awesome depth when they had guys like Evan Rodrigues scoring well early in the year. Pittsburgh's depth is no better than ours.
Joe S. said:Pittsburg also has the honour of being eliminated by montreal.
hobarth said:Pitts top 3 players, Malkin, Crosby and Letang have missed 55 games this year, their support player's scoring stats are comparable with TO's however they do make TO look bad as the Kraken did for about 30 minutes tonite.
Scoring stats are one way to judge a team but another is actual team results, Pitts. has 1 less point than TO, TO has 1 game in hand, and they didn't have their core for 55 games, TO's core has missed 18 games.
I would think that Pitts' support scoring stats would be considerably higher if their core had been healthier. I think that TO has been outplayed since they lost the two games against Pitts we shouldn't have great expectations for TO's playoff hopes this year.
hobarth said:Pitts top 3 players, Malkin, Crosby and Letang have missed 55 games this year, their support player's scoring stats are comparable with TO's however they do make TO look bad as the Kraken did for about 30 minutes tonite.
Scoring stats are one way to judge a team but another is actual team results, Pitts. has 1 less point than TO, TO has 1 game in hand, and they didn't have their core for 55 games, TO's core has missed 18 games.
I would think that Pitts' support scoring stats would be considerably higher if their core had been healthier. I think that TO has been outplayed since they lost the two games against Pitts we shouldn't have great expectations for TO's playoff hopes this year.
CarltonTheBear said:The Toronto "wild card" Maple Leafs are back to being 5th in the league in points/points percentage.
CarltonTheBear said:The Toronto "wild card" Maple Leafs are back to being 5th in the league in points/points percentage.
Yherman said:https://twitter.com/MapleLeafs/status/1501626392395534342
k...
Bill_Berg_is_sad said:Yherman said:https://twitter.com/MapleLeafs/status/1501626392395534342
k...