• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2026-27 Toronto Maple Leafs General Discussion | Official: Sundin & Chayka to lead front office

Feels like this team could be good and contend if the team play updates work, or it could be a repeat of last year with no 1st overall to look forward to.
 
On the face of it, it’s a lot of money for mostly grinders.

But:
Committed grinders are far more effective than a committee of players forced to grind.

Coaching last season also had an impact in that their premier skill C was deployed to defend heavily with offense-first wingers who couldn’t perform offense properly.

Will this work better? I think the lines have clearer roles and expectations they can hang their hat on, and there is room within those roles to rotate and elevate and reward performance. At least three skaters can flow between top 6 and bottom 6 roles capably as the situation requires: Knies, Cowan, Paul, and arguably Tavares.

If it fails, most new pieces are very sellable at the deadline to recoup futures (outside of Raddysh). Sheet’s clear for whatever Matthews decides as well.
I think Sissons, Paul, and Joshua can all contribute more offensively given the right opportunity. Mushy middle is gone. It's nice to remove offensive-only guys from lines 3 and 4.
 
PP Options:
Matthews, Nylander, Tavares, Knies, Cowan, Roslovic, Paul, Joshua
Raddysh, OEL, Andrae, Rielly (uhh...)

PK Options:
Duhaime, Sissons (FO), Blueger (FO), Paul (FO), Lorentz, Joshua, Matthews (FO), Knies
McCabe, Tanev, Stecher, Raddysh, Rielly (ugh)
 
Feels like this team could be good and contend if the team play updates work, or it could be a repeat of last year with no 1st overall to look forward to.
I can see Bob really not working out which definitely does scare me but at the very least you have players willing to muck it up and not just stand around when their captain gets his knee obliterated.

The other thing I like is that they're all two year deals. If they aren't good next year we can pivot off of a large number of these contracts pretty painlessly and can start the rebuild in earnest. We don't have our picks for two years, but unless we hand Boston or Philly Landon Du Pont then eating the next two to have McKenna is the best outcome of a very crappy Treliving timeline.
 
Last edited:
Puckpedia says this new roster is the oldest team in the league.
That is not the end of the world maybe as many contenders are on the older side but it raises some eyebrows for a claim of longer-term contention to retain Matthews who is looking to extend 8 years ...
I think it depends on how Puckpedia calculates that age. I think they still have Jarnkrok, and Stetcher in there, as well as Zach McEwen. You replace those players with a McKenna, Danford, and Quillan, and that starts to bring that number down. Also, if you replace Stolarz with AA, that would also bring that number down. I think they would be more middle of the pack with those numbers. The second oldest team currently is Vegas, and they just went to a cup final, so it can't be all bad to be old.
 
I think it depends on how Puckpedia calculates that age. I think they still have Jarnkrok, and Stetcher in there, as well as Zach McEwen. You replace those players with a McKenna, Danford, and Quillan, and that starts to bring that number down. Also, if you replace Stolarz with AA, that would also bring that number down. I think they would be more middle of the pack with those numbers. The second oldest team currently is Vegas, and they just went to a cup final, so it can't be all bad to be old.
I do think it's hard to compare the two though. We are definitely going to have to pivot in a couple of years just on the basis of how short these contracts are. It's going to be a fascinating couple of years at least.
 
I'm not crazy about the top-6/bottom-6 method, especially against some of the other top teams in the East. But for whatever its worth, I do think this is a group of players better suited to going that route than we've seen in the past here.

But I don't think it's a guarantee that's how our lines end up looking. Chayka was rather complimentary of Roslovic's ability to play centre, and obviously of course he's going to say that to the media but if we take him at his word there then there's a chance the middle-6 looks something like:

Paul-Roslovic-Nylander
McKenna-Tavares-Sissons

Each line there has a (potential in one case) game-breaking talent, a guy who can definitely score some goals, and a defensive/physical presence.

That leaves Knies and Cowan to play with Matthews, a line that I thought deserved a much longer look together this past season. And of course the defensive face-off eating 4th line with Blueger & co.
 
I am glad Carlo is gone, a monster of a man doing squat after Gudas took out Matthews. It's symbolic that he's gone. Stop obsessing with what you want someone to be or what you have invested in a guy and just move on.
 
This is damage control and as we've seen with public statements from hockey players lately who behind the scenes have been unhappy with their team that front facing talk is extremely cheap. He might stay for now, but I doubt he stays there all year and I can't see how he extends after all this. This oozes a revisit at least by the trade deadline.

I don't think that is news.
CBJ are in the same boat as the Leafs are with Matthews and the Oilers are with McDavid. Next July 1 they are all eligible to re-sign for more years. CBJ and the Leafs would like to recover assets if their star is going to walk. Oilers will be hoping their star doesn't walk.
As I've said before, the sooner the player makes the decision to move on, the more his team can get back in a trade. We see more evidence of that with the compensation bantered about for Werenski moving with 2 years left on his deal or Brady moving with 2 years left on his deal.

Maybe the media circus in Columbus makes him want to leave by the deadline. If he's leaving, his team would prefer that he does sooner because their return will be more and they're not winning a Cup any time soon.
As of yesterday, the Leafs are in a similar boat - this is not a Cup contender.
 
I think Sissons, Paul, and Joshua can all contribute more offensively given the right opportunity. Mushy middle is gone. It's nice to remove offensive-only guys from lines 3 and 4.
Joshua had as many 5v5 goals as Knies, 1 less then McMann in less games. Paul has scored 20 a few times.
 
ChatGPT says (note the Hart trophy winner....):

predict nhl26/27 final standings


With most of the major offseason still to unfold, this is necessarily speculative. Recent trades and free-agent moves (including Edmonton's retooling and Toronto's continued roster changes) could shift these rankings before opening night.

Eastern Conference​

Atlantic Division​

RankTeamPoints
1Florida Panthers112
2Toronto Maple Leafs107
3Tampa Bay Lightning104
4Ottawa Senators98
5Montreal Canadiens95
6Buffalo Sabres86
7Detroit Red Wings84
8Boston Bruins76

Metropolitan Division​

RankTeamPoints
1Carolina Hurricanes114
2New Jersey Devils108
3Washington Capitals101
4New York Rangers98
5Columbus Blue Jackets92
6New York Islanders89
7Philadelphia Flyers82
8Pittsburgh Penguins79
Eastern Wild Cards
  1. Ottawa (98)
  2. NY Rangers (98)

Western Conference​

Central Division​

RankTeamPoints
1Dallas Stars111
2Colorado Avalanche109
3Winnipeg Jets105
4Utah Mammoth99
5Minnesota Wild97
6St. Louis Blues91
7Nashville Predators83
8Chicago Blackhawks79

Pacific Division​

RankTeamPoints
1Vegas Golden Knights110
2Edmonton Oilers107
3Los Angeles Kings103
4Vancouver Canucks95
5Calgary Flames92
6Anaheim Ducks88
7San Jose Sharks84
8Seattle Kraken80
Western Wild Cards
  1. Utah (99)
  2. Minnesota (97)

Award predictions​

  • Presidents' Trophy: Carolina Hurricanes (114 pts)
  • Art Ross: Connor McDavid
  • Rocket Richard: Auston Matthews
  • Hart Trophy: Nathan MacKinnon
  • Vezina Trophy: Connor Hellebuyck
  • Calder Trophy: A top 2026 draft pick (too early to call)

2027 Stanley Cup Playoff prediction​

Conference Finals
  • Carolina defeats Toronto
  • Colorado defeats Vegas
Stanley Cup Final
  • Colorado Avalanche defeat Carolina Hurricanes in 6 games

Biggest surprises​

  • Ottawa firmly establishes itself as a playoff team.
  • Boston misses the playoffs by a comfortable margin as its retool continues.
  • Chicago improves but still falls short.
  • San Jose takes a step forward but narrowly misses the postseason despite its young core continuing to develop.
If you'd like, I can also produce:
  1. a "most likely" standings,
  2. a "bold predictions" version with bigger surprises, or
  3. a projection using advanced metrics (expected goals, aging curves, and roster value) rather than intuition.
 
Back
Top