Dr. Bobby Leafer said:
Well, two days later and all I can say is I'm okay with never being okay with happened... Okay? :-\ - Movin' on.
Geez, you never have to be
okay with it!
Two thoughts, neither of which is particularly mind-blowing or original, but anyway:
1) The Leafs weren't going to win the Cup, regardless of the outcome of that game. I'm sure virtually all of us know that in our heads and probably our hearts, too. And, yes, while a team is alive and playing, there's
always a chance. But they really weren't going to win the Cup, and surely you know that. So what was the cost of the loss? A handful of additional games that would have eventually ended in disappointment, multiple millions in playoff revenues that MLSE doesn't really need, some additional playoff experience for the team, and one really ugly night for all of us. That's it. It's not nothing, but in the end it's simply a fate met sooner and and more shockingly than it should have.
2) As others have remarked, in 2010, Boston choked in my estimation FAR worse than this (blowing both a 3-0 series lead, and a 3-0 lead in game 7), and they won the Cup the next year. Like Potvin29 said, the "6 shots" Leafs team returned to the Conference finals a couple years later. If you're worried about the team being permanently affected by this bad loss by a young team, I don't think your worries are founded.
To me as a Leaf fan, a far more devastating loss was to LA in 1993, because the team was getting ridiculously close to a Cup, and were screwed by both bad officiating and a subsequent inadequate performance. And even then, the Leafs went right back to the Conference finals the next year. The 1993 team was 5 wins from a Cup, the 2013 teams was 13 wins away. This was a bad loss in what was ultimately a small stakes game.