Game 64: Maple Leafs @ Blackhawks 8:00pm - Another road loss ?

[TML fan]

Well, it was a good try I guess...

The suck continues

 

[Bonsixx]

If nothing else, at least they hurt Stalberg! Take that, Chicago!

 

[bustaheims]

Jim Ralph just mentioned that when the Blackhawks are leading after 2, they haven't lost since 1937.

Jim Ralph should probably check his meds.

 

[Sudafederov]

Bring back Matt Nichol! 

These guys have been gassed since the All Star break.

 

[Derk]

I almost wish that had've gone in.

Almost.

 

[Jeremiad]

Who was the Leaf dman who fell down with 10 seconds left there?

 

[4th Liner]

*sigh*

 

[azzurri63]

That Hossa guy's pretty good.

He's a talented player but we make everyone look good. Star players can be in slumps, or players who usually don't score always seem to do something against us. It happens often and that just shows you how weak this team is defensively and as a whole unit not just the D. That is why we are in the dilemma we are in and for 3-4 years we haven't been able to fix it.

 

[crazyperfectdevil]

i hope we see a lot more of the 4th line against kane in the 3rd...that'll be good

 

[azzurri63]

Kane what a little puke. Catherine Dolan almost the same size. Don't understand how a guy like this can be a #1 overall pick. Old days he wouldn't of even been picked in the 1st round or possibly drafted. How times have changed. Imagine him playing against Clarke, Schultz etc lol.

 

[BermudaBudsFan]

What's with Grabovski?  That may be a Burke regret -- not trading him.  He has all but disappeared.

 

[Mikhail Bloodnovsky]

Can this team really pull this off? 0-9-1 in last 10 I mean

 

[Kessel Run]

Jim Ralph just mentioned that when the Blackhawks are leading after 2, they haven't lost since 1937.

Jim Ralph should probably check his meds.

Yeah that can't be true can it?

 

[crazyperfectdevil]

Jim Ralph just mentioned that when the Blackhawks are leading after 2, they haven't lost since 1937.

Jim Ralph should probably check his meds.

Yeah that can't be true can it?

only if it specifically refers to the leafs

 

[Kessel Run]

Jim Ralph just mentioned that when the Blackhawks are leading after 2, they haven't lost since 1937.

Jim Ralph should probably check his meds.

Yeah that can't be true can it?

only if it specifically refers to the leafs

Yeah just checked NHL.com and the Hawks have one regulation loss and two OT losses when leading after 2.

 

[WAYNEINIONA]

What's with Grabovski?  That may be a Burke regret -- not trading him.  He has all but disappeared.

He's the guy that assisted on Macs goal.

 

[bustaheims]

Yeah that can't be true can it?

Considering they have 3 losses when leading after 2 this season, I'd say no.

 

[bustaheims]

only if it specifically refers to the leafs

THat's possible, but, I imagine it's more specific than that - like, leading after 2 against the Leafs in Chicago.

 

[ZBBM]

OK, so I misconstrued what Ralphie said.  I admit it. 

 

[BermudaBudsFan]

What's with Grabovski?  That may be a Burke regret -- not trading him.  He has all but disappeared.

He's the guy that assisted on Macs goal.

That's true.  And he scored in the first period, no, five games ago, no seven games ago, no...