herman said:
So you're saying private emails are par for the course throughout Washington and didn't warrant the level of scrutiny and vitriol that was levelled against Clinton in the name of 'balanced' reporting.
They all warranted the level of scrutiny. Comey wasn't even sure about commencing this investigation in the first place. He admitted that the whole thing got out of hand even before they were even halfway through, courtesy of the Republicans 'broadcasting' it as if it was a fait accompli for Clinton.
Comey knew that this investigation regarding the Clinton emails was going to be his "downfall" and the subsequent ruination of the FBI's reputation, especially considering who Clinron's opponent was and who won the ensuing presidential election.
Compared to the Clinton situation, (in which he found few discrepancies and for which he stated that it didn't warrant a prison term or anything of that ilk), the Trump/Russia investigation presented much more incriminating evidence of all that had/has been associated with election tampering/Trump collusion/etc.
Comey stops short of admitting his regrets over much ado about really nothing in terms of security breaching concerning the Clinton emails. Too bad it didn't translate that way before the Republicans had a chance to scream and shout about and of it, creating a maelstrom of confusion & suspicion of Comey's and the FBI's handling of the situation and their reputation being questioned thereafter.
He, by the way, mentions that as per personal domain accounts go, as an example former Secretary of State Colin Powell had one and he never discussed sensitive high-level information through email protocol. Government servers are secure and it's up to the individual on how they utilize and use their personal accounts, with whom they conversate with, and what is discussed. Strict guidelines are there to be followed but sometimes there may be a fine line with what constitutes an overstep of protocol.