ZBBM
Active member
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I don't think it was like Thornton's, the puck was under Andersen's pad.
Uh, OK, why didn't they call that the first time?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I don't think it was like Thornton's, the puck was under Andersen's pad.
So they call it a good goal and then on the challenge it's not. Makes alot of sense NHL lolZee said:Of course.
It's consistent there. If he touched the puck first I think it would have counted.Bender said:Good! This whole sequence is so stupid. Be consistent with the call. Jesus.
Agree with that. They should have said no goal right away.Deebo said:It's ridiculous that it had to be challenged
Guilt Trip said:Holl hasn't been good tonight and why is Rielly trying to make a move at the Habs Blueline? Dump it in.
L K said:So a non-call on a trip of Rielly leads to a scoring chance for Montreal at the end of the period. Looking forward to the selective officiating of the 3rd period
L K said:At what point do we consider a game a disappointment if Matthews and Marner don?t combine for 6 points?