Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bender said:I feel really conflicted about this win.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Bender said:I feel really conflicted about this win.
I don't. Screw the Wings, screw Datsyuk and Zetterberg and all the rest of them walk-on-waterers.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Give Carlyle credit. Howard probably didn't have a book on Santorelli, and Santo has shown some good offensive poise. Nice change-up.
CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Give Carlyle credit. Howard probably didn't have a book on Santorelli, and Santo has shown some good offensive poise. Nice change-up.
Santorelli has been very good in the shootout in his career. 42.9% heading into tonight.
Potvin29 said:Has anyone made the 'Reimer was just okay' joke yet?
bustaheims said:mirtle: Toss that Nashville game and Reimer's save percentage is actually .921. So there's that.
bustaheims said:Potvin29 said:Has anyone made the 'Reimer was just okay' joke yet?
Nah. That joke is just okay.
@cotsonika
Carlyle on Reimer: "He was just OK." Big laugh. "I've been waiting a long time for that."
Chev-boyar-sky said:bustaheims said:mirtle: Toss that Nashville game and Reimer's save percentage is actually .921. So there's that.
Nope. He's "awful". Deal with it. Never play him. He's the red headed step child of backups. Play the guy once a month but only if you really have to.
Poor guy. Hutchinson, Darling and a bunch of other unknown backups are seeing the net with much more frequency than Reimer. Why? Carlyle, I guess.
bustaheims said:CarltonTheBear said:Hey there's Phil. Imagine we win this?
Imagine. Part of me hopes they don't. I think they really need to feel the full brunt of this pathetic performance, and a win would take some of the weight off of it.
RedLeaf said:I really didn't think it was that bad of a performance, esp. coming off a big win the night before. Give them some credit once and a while. They played good enough to get the 'W'. Reimer was the difference, but that doesn't discount all the on ice battles it took to win this one....
bustaheims said:RedLeaf said:I really didn't think it was that bad of a performance, esp. coming off a big win the night before. Give them some credit once and a while. They played good enough to get the 'W'. Reimer was the difference, but that doesn't discount all the on ice battles it took to win this one....
Wasn't that bad a performance? They put up the 3rd worst single game possession numbers in the league this season. They spent 3/4 of 5 on 5 time in their defensive zone. They were outshot by more than 20 shots, out attempted by close to 50! The only player on the team that deserves any credit is Reimer. They were completely outclassed, outplayed and outworked. I honestly don't know what game you're watching or what shade of blue and white your glasses are tinted, but, man, you're the only person here that's even suggesting they weren't that bad or that they deserve any credit for tonight.
RedLeaf said:bustaheims said:CarltonTheBear said:Hey there's Phil. Imagine we win this?
Imagine. Part of me hopes they don't. I think they really need to feel the full brunt of this pathetic performance, and a win would take some of the weight off of it.
I really didn't think it was that bad of a performance, esp. coming off a big win the night before. Give them some credit once and a while. They played good enough to get the 'W'. Reimer was the difference, but that doesn't discount all the on ice battles it took to win this one....
crazyperfectdevil said:RedLeaf said:bustaheims said:CarltonTheBear said:Hey there's Phil. Imagine we win this?
Imagine. Part of me hopes they don't. I think they really need to feel the full brunt of this pathetic performance, and a win would take some of the weight off of it.
I really didn't think it was that bad of a performance, esp. coming off a big win the night before. Give them some credit once and a while. They played good enough to get the 'W'. Reimer was the difference, but that doesn't discount all the on ice battles it took to win this one....
There were definitely some mitigating circumstances for the leafs in this one. Like back to back nights, first game on the road in a while, their opponent hadn't played since sunday. But they played awful. Most of the time they couldn't even touch the puck. If you played this game 10 times over the leafs would lose 9 of them. Fortunately for them this was the 1 out of 10.