Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I'm not really disagreeing with you, but what was Kadri tonight?
In any case, I don't understand why Bozak didn't take them.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:That's unfortunately what we can't afford. A stacked team could. If Rielly weren't here I might have more patience with Gardiner.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:That's unfortunately what we can't afford. A stacked team could. If Rielly weren't here I might have more patience with Gardiner.
L K said:Tigger said:mc said:Patrick said:Carlyle on Reimer. "He was okay, just okay."
Reimer on that comment: "He thought I was just okay? Hmm I thought I was good."
One of them is 100% gone in the off season.
Goodbye Randy.
Could be both of them, hard to say.
I have to say. I'm locked in that the coach is the problem with this team. I don't think they suddenly become a top puck possession team with a guy like Laviolette but I'm done with this team being considered good when they need their goaltender to give up less than 2 goals a game AND have a .930 SV% to win.
CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:That's unfortunately what we can't afford. A stacked team could. If Rielly weren't here I might have more patience with Gardiner.
If a team can't afford the luxury of two offensive defencemen then there's a problem with the team not the defenceman.
bustaheims said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:That's unfortunately what we can't afford. A stacked team could. If Rielly weren't here I might have more patience with Gardiner.
They can't afford a guy who makes the occasional mistake in his own end but spends the majority of his ES ice time on the offensive side of the puck? More time on the offensive side of the puck is exactly what the Leafs need. Keep the other team off the board by keeping the puck off their sticks for as long as possible. The Leafs need more guys that do that, not less.
Tigger said:The coaching staff has contributed to my own concerns about the success of the team but so to has the talent level on the roster, in fact, more so the latter.
Make the team better, better results will follow, fire the coach, pretty much the same results will follow on balance.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:If only that were true.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:A defenseman who can't play defense is a problem, always.
bustaheims said:Tigger said:The coaching staff has contributed to my own concerns about the success of the team but so to has the talent level on the roster, in fact, more so the latter.
Make the team better, better results will follow, fire the coach, pretty much the same results will follow on balance.
Getting the team to a roughly league average defensive performance - which they should absolutely be able to do with the talent on the roster - would cut down 30-40 goals off their current goals against if they maintained their current Sv% (which, with less shots against, shouldn't be a problem - in fact, they could even see it improve slightly). That's about half a goal a game, and would put them in the top 8-10 teams in the league in that category. The talent really isn't the issue. It's how they're deployed.
CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:A defenseman who can't play defense is a problem, always.
And we solved that problem by trading Fraser away.
Gardiner's biggest problem "defensively" is
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:A defenseman who can't play defense is a problem, always.
And we solved that problem by trading Fraser away.
Gardiner's biggest problem "defensively" is
Giveaways. Rarely wins pucks battles. Not that great positionally. Passing is not in the same league as Rielly.
He's an outstanding skater and very good offensively. Defensively he's not very good, and shows no signs that he ever will be. That's why I'd be willing to trade him if the return were high enough.
But what the hell, if you guys think he's good enough defensively, then you're welcome to it.
Tigger said:L K said:Tigger said:mc said:Patrick said:Carlyle on Reimer. "He was okay, just okay."
Reimer on that comment: "He thought I was just okay? Hmm I thought I was good."
One of them is 100% gone in the off season.
Goodbye Randy.
Could be both of them, hard to say.
I have to say. I'm locked in that the coach is the problem with this team. I don't think they suddenly become a top puck possession team with a guy like Laviolette but I'm done with this team being considered good when they need their goaltender to give up less than 2 goals a game AND have a .930 SV% to win.
The coaching staff has contributed to my own concerns about the success of the team but so to has the talent level on the roster, in fact, more so the latter.
Make the team better, better results will follow, fire the coach, pretty much the same results will follow on balance.
Patrick said:Carlyle on Reimer. "He was okay, just okay."
Reimer on that comment: "He thought I was just okay? Hmm I thought I was good."
One of them is 100% gone in the off season.
CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:A defenseman who can't play defense is a problem, always.
And we solved that problem by trading Fraser away.
Gardiner's biggest problem "defensively" is when he jumps into the play and nobody covers for him. And while sometimes he may jump in at inopportune moments, I think tonight's goal is a good example of when people criticize him unfairly. He did everything a defenceman of his talents is supposed to do on a play like that. His team was down by one late and he had an opportunity to pinch and put pressure on a defender when no other Leafs forward was around. It's the responsibility of the forward (in this case JVR) to know what's going on and back him up. So how is that Gardiner's fault that nobody did?