• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Nylander signs 6-year contract

Michael said:
Nik the Trik said:
I am very happy that Nylander is staying in Toronto but I do sort of feel like Leafs fans would be wise to not lean too heavily on the idea that winning in Toronto is somehow better than winning somewhere else. I feel like that takes us uncomfortably close to being the sort of caricature some people say we are. It's the Cup, if you win it it's probably pretty terrific no matter where.

Maybe, but was the Cubs World Series win not more exciting than the Royals the year before or the Astros the year after?

The Leafs have been without for a long time, in spite of a massive loyal fan base. Shanny talked about how much it would mean to win in Toronto as well. There?s good reason why people say it.
I want to see the Leafs win before I croak
 
Michael said:
Maybe, but was the Cubs World Series win not more exciting than the Royals the year before or the Astros the year after?

To who though? The players on the Royals and Astros(who represent a huge city that hadn't won a World Series in their entire 56 year history btw) didn't seem less happy than players on the Cubs. The fans at the Astros parade didn't seem any less enthusiastic.
 
Nik the Trik said:
To who though? The players on the Royals and Astros(who represent a huge city that hadn't won a World Series in their entire 56 year history btw) didn't seem less happy than players on the Cubs. The fans at the Astros parade didn't seem any less enthusiastic.

Wouldn?t you agree that the national (even international) appeal for a Cubs win was far greater? In that sense, the Cubs winning was a bigger deal. Someday (soon I hope) we may see the same for the Leafs.
 
Michael said:
Wouldn?t you agree that the national (even international) appeal for a Cubs win was far greater? In that sense, the Cubs winning was a bigger deal. Someday (soon I hope) we may see the same for the Leafs.

I think that Chicago being a bigger club with a larger and more established fanbase drove ratings, sure. But this was about whether or not players would necessarily care, not if it would drive casuals to turn on their TV.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Michael said:
Wouldn?t you agree that the national (even international) appeal for a Cubs win was far greater? In that sense, the Cubs winning was a bigger deal. Someday (soon I hope) we may see the same for the Leafs.

I think that Chicago being a bigger club with a larger and more established fanbase drove ratings, sure. But this was about whether or not players would necessarily care, not if it would drive casuals to turn on their TV.

I think the inference there was that if you won in Toronto, with the bigger fanbase and all that, that it would be a bigger deal because of the bigger more established, and Cup starved, fanbase.

So maybe you'd be a big deal to more people, and that would make it more enjoyable?

I don't know if it's a great argument, because I think if you were a Jet, and Winnipeg won a Cup, you'd be a big deal too, no matter what Kelsey's you went to for dinner in Manitoba.
 
Frank E said:
I think the inference there was that if you won in Toronto, with the bigger fanbase and all that, that it would be a bigger deal because of the bigger more established, and Cup starved, fanbase.

So maybe you'd be a big deal to more people, and that would make it more enjoyable?

I don't know if it's a great argument, because I think if you were a Jet, and Winnipeg won a Cup, you'd be a big deal too, no matter what Kelsey's you went to for dinner in Manitoba.

No, I agree. The issue is that if it's a difference, it's a difference in degree. I get the idea that hockey players are bigger celebrities in Toronto than in Arizona but as we've seen, that's not always a positive for players. Winning a cup would just seem to magnify that.

But even beyond that, whenever we talk about this we always tend to talk about Toronto, the biggest deal, vs. Arizona or a city that represents the other extreme. We never talk about the significant room between them. Take Minnesota or Calgary, for instance, would winning a cup in Toronto mean an appreciable difference for players here than there? That's much less clear and to the extent that it's true I think it's just a reflection of Toronto as a city more than any level of hockey fandom.

That said, I still stand by my saying that it's precisely that level of fandom here that would make fans here probably be just as quick to turn on players after a cup win as before. Winning will probably just breed desire for more winning.
 
cabber24 said:
I don't get the NHLPA comment? In order for it to be processed, they need it by 4:30?

https://twitter.com/mirtle/status/1069775937288335360

This is literally the standard teenage response to a deadline.
 
herman said:
https://twitter.com/mirtle/status/1069706937498025985

This feels like a shot at Chiarelli.

Just judging from reading the transcript of his remarks, it seems like he was dodging the question as much as he could.  Not sure he could be real happy with Nylander there.
 
herman said:
cabber24 said:
I don't get the NHLPA comment? In order for it to be processed, they need it by 4:30?

https://twitter.com/mirtle/status/1069775937288335360

This is literally the standard teenage response to a deadline.

A 22-year-old teenager, I guess.  :o 
 
giphy.gif
 
We're in trouble.

https://www.thestar.com/sports/breakaway_blog/2018/12/04/nhl-s--83-million-cap-could-crunch-maple-leafs-in-2019-20.html

Kapanen and Johnsson on the attached link are slated at 2.5M and 1.5M... yeah right. Marleau's contract could cost us a Johnsson or Kapanen or both. I really hope there was a wink an nudge agreement for the third year of his deal. Need to start giving him rest days for a "sore back", setting the table for Robidas island next year. Need the cap space in a bad way.

Brown/Hyman/Zaitsev/Oz may have to be replaced with lower salary guys. We're still going to be pretty damn good I just hope we can find some cheap role players.
 
cabber24 said:
We're in trouble.

https://www.thestar.com/sports/breakaway_blog/2018/12/04/nhl-s--83-million-cap-could-crunch-maple-leafs-in-2019-20.html

Kapanen and Johnsson on the attached link are slated at 2.5M and 1.5M... yeah right. Marleau's contract could cost us a Johnsson or Kapanen or both. I really hope there was a wink an nudge agreement for the third year of his deal. Need to start giving him rest days for a "sore back", setting the table for Robidas island next year. Need the cap space in a bad way.

Brown/Hyman/Zaitsev/Oz may have to be replaced with lower salary guys. We're still going to be pretty damn good I just hope we can find some cheap role players.

I'm not too worried. Brown may have to go. Zaitsev going would help. Kapanen and Johnsson are candidates for bridge deals. It's tight, but it's not really scary tight.
 
cabber24 said:
We're in trouble.

https://www.thestar.com/sports/breakaway_blog/2018/12/04/nhl-s--83-million-cap-could-crunch-maple-leafs-in-2019-20.html

Kapanen and Johnsson on the attached link are slated at 2.5M and 1.5M... yeah right.

I really don't think these two guesses are that crazy. I wouldn't be surprised if both are signed to 1-year deals just so the team can get past the Marleau deal and then they'll get raises after that. The Leafs will actually be able to sort of use their lack of cap space in their favour in these negotiations. They can hold a strong stance and literally just say "this is all we can afford to give you right now, take it or leave it".
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top