Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OldTimeHockey said:pnjunction said:So no a few goals will not make it go away, I think it only goes away if Toronto starts looking like the playoff team it was supposed to be 4 years ago when he was brought in to this mess.
Wait a minute...Toronto was suppose to be a playoff team 4 years ago?
pnjunction said:BlueWhiteBlood said:Kessel will be fine, once he starts scoring again, people will forget about this.
The fact that he can walk for nothing at the end of next season is there regardless of how well or poorly he's playing.
pnjunction said:OldTimeHockey said:pnjunction said:So no a few goals will not make it go away, I think it only goes away if Toronto starts looking like the playoff team it was supposed to be 4 years ago when he was brought in to this mess.
Wait a minute...Toronto was suppose to be a playoff team 4 years ago?
I don't think you throw your 1st's around for assets if you think you're going to be in the basement.
Burke's plan seems to have been for Kessel and the UFA d-men signings (Beauchemin, Komisarek) to push us into playoff territory and make losing those 1sts sting less. It failed spectacularly.
Britishbulldog said:If the Leafs had simply made the playoffs the 2010 draft year, the players selected around the 16th spot had names like Derek Forbort, Vladimir Tarasenko and Joey Hishon.
If the Leafs had simply made the playoffs the 2011 draft year, the players selected around the 16th spot had names like Joel Armia, J. T. Miller and Jamie Oleksiak.
If the trade had been Kessel @ a ppg for Joey Hishon and Joel Armia it would have been a much different story but...like Z B-B McFate said...Kessel was NOT a franchise player anyway.
Potvin29 said:mc said:We gave up three picks to get Kessel and those picks have proved what a mass overpayment they were. But we all know that already.
Currently, I think, if Kessel was shopped, we *might* get a first round pick in return and that too NOT from a mediocre team - a contender, so that pick will easily be either 30 or 29. Because Kessel is a complimentary player. Not a centre piece. He is the last piece of the puzzle for a contender. Not someone you build around. Four years have taught us that. His scoring hasn't lifted the Leafs from the leagues' basement standings.
Sidney Crosby's scoring didn't lift Pittsburgh from the leagues basement.
cw said:mc said:We gave up three picks to get Kessel and those picks have proved what a mass overpayment they were. But we all know that already.
Currently, I think, if Kessel was shopped, we *might* get a first round pick in return and that too NOT from a mediocre team - a contender, so that pick will easily be either 30 or 29. Because Kessel is a complimentary player. Not a centre piece. He is the last piece of the puzzle for a contender. Not someone you build around. Four years have taught us that. His scoring hasn't lifted the Leafs from the leagues' basement standings.
A first round pick is about 50/50 whether they do much in the NHL. A low 1st round pick is less than that. Kessel isn't a 50/50 possibility of whether he'll play in the NHL. Ignoring chance of injury every player has, he's a proven 30+ goal scorer. So he's likely to attract more than that. Remember, with Boston, he'd had one good season. He's since proven that wasn't a fluke.
Kaberle got a 1st round pick & Joe Colborne (1st round pick prospect) and a conditional 2nd round pick (lowish picks because Boston was near the top of the league). Dmen are worth more than wingers but Kessel has age on his side. So that's roughly what one could expect for Kessel given a few teams would be bidding - probably more for the condition if he re-signs.
EDIT: rather than nailing down what exactly his value is with the above, as I really need to give it more thought, the point is that I think Kessel is worth much more than a low 1st round pick.
mc said:Ummm, Crosby wasn't drafted because he could score. Yes thats a good thing to have. He was drafted so that they could build a team around him. And in four years they did and won the cup. Cant say that about Toronto and that is why all this talk has resurfaced.
mc said:Potvin29 said:mc said:We gave up three picks to get Kessel and those picks have proved what a mass overpayment they were. But we all know that already.
Currently, I think, if Kessel was shopped, we *might* get a first round pick in return and that too NOT from a mediocre team - a contender, so that pick will easily be either 30 or 29. Because Kessel is a complimentary player. Not a centre piece. He is the last piece of the puzzle for a contender. Not someone you build around. Four years have taught us that. His scoring hasn't lifted the Leafs from the leagues' basement standings.
Sidney Crosby's scoring didn't lift Pittsburgh from the leagues basement.
Ummm, Crosby wasn't drafted because he could score. Yes thats a good thing to have. He was drafted so that they could build a team around him. And in four years they did and won the cup. Cant say that about Toronto and that is why all this talk has resurfaced.
Kessel is a scoring machine. What Burke gave up from him is what people give up for a center piece player.
Potvin29 said:mc said:Potvin29 said:mc said:We gave up three picks to get Kessel and those picks have proved what a mass overpayment they were. But we all know that already.
Currently, I think, if Kessel was shopped, we *might* get a first round pick in return and that too NOT from a mediocre team - a contender, so that pick will easily be either 30 or 29. Because Kessel is a complimentary player. Not a centre piece. He is the last piece of the puzzle for a contender. Not someone you build around. Four years have taught us that. His scoring hasn't lifted the Leafs from the leagues' basement standings.
Sidney Crosby's scoring didn't lift Pittsburgh from the leagues basement.
Ummm, Crosby wasn't drafted because he could score. Yes thats a good thing to have. He was drafted so that they could build a team around him. And in four years they did and won the cup. Cant say that about Toronto and that is why all this talk has resurfaced.
Kessel is a scoring machine. What Burke gave up from him is what people give up for a center piece player.
And he scored over 100 pts in his first season and they finished last. You said Kessel's scoring couldn't lift the Leafs, and Crosby's scoring couldn't lift the Pens - they were only 'lifted' when the rest of the team got better around him.
Bender said:cw said:mc said:We gave up three picks to get Kessel and those picks have proved what a mass overpayment they were. But we all know that already.
Currently, I think, if Kessel was shopped, we *might* get a first round pick in return and that too NOT from a mediocre team - a contender, so that pick will easily be either 30 or 29. Because Kessel is a complimentary player. Not a centre piece. He is the last piece of the puzzle for a contender. Not someone you build around. Four years have taught us that. His scoring hasn't lifted the Leafs from the leagues' basement standings.
A first round pick is about 50/50 whether they do much in the NHL. A low 1st round pick is less than that. Kessel isn't a 50/50 possibility of whether he'll play in the NHL. Ignoring chance of injury every player has, he's a proven 30+ goal scorer. So he's likely to attract more than that. Remember, with Boston, he'd had one good season. He's since proven that wasn't a fluke.
Kaberle got a 1st round pick & Joe Colborne (1st round pick prospect) and a conditional 2nd round pick (lowish picks because Boston was near the top of the league). Dmen are worth more than wingers but Kessel has age on his side. So that's roughly what one could expect for Kessel given a few teams would be bidding - probably more for the condition if he re-signs.
EDIT: rather than nailing down what exactly his value is with the above, as I really need to give it more thought, the point is that I think Kessel is worth much more than a low 1st round pick.
Its funny how much we undervalue Kessel's worth due to the trade history. It's almost comical.
Bender said:cw said:mc said:We gave up three picks to get Kessel and those picks have proved what a mass overpayment they were. But we all know that already.
Currently, I think, if Kessel was shopped, we *might* get a first round pick in return and that too NOT from a mediocre team - a contender, so that pick will easily be either 30 or 29. Because Kessel is a complimentary player. Not a centre piece. He is the last piece of the puzzle for a contender. Not someone you build around. Four years have taught us that. His scoring hasn't lifted the Leafs from the leagues' basement standings.
A first round pick is about 50/50 whether they do much in the NHL. A low 1st round pick is less than that. Kessel isn't a 50/50 possibility of whether he'll play in the NHL. Ignoring chance of injury every player has, he's a proven 30+ goal scorer. So he's likely to attract more than that. Remember, with Boston, he'd had one good season. He's since proven that wasn't a fluke.
Kaberle got a 1st round pick & Joe Colborne (1st round pick prospect) and a conditional 2nd round pick (lowish picks because Boston was near the top of the league). Dmen are worth more than wingers but Kessel has age on his side. So that's roughly what one could expect for Kessel given a few teams would be bidding - probably more for the condition if he re-signs.
EDIT: rather than nailing down what exactly his value is with the above, as I really need to give it more thought, the point is that I think Kessel is worth much more than a low 1st round pick.
Its funny how much we undervalue Kessel's worth due to the trade history. It's almost comical.
Highlander said:I agree with TML fan. Those are the untouchables as well as Reilly, I would like to keep Grabbo and Kuli as well
TML fan said:But we are looking for top 5 picks right? So if the idea is to get a top 5 pick, wouldn't it make more sense to trade everyone else, and keep Kessel? He's one of our youngest players.
If we are looking to blow up the team, the only players I'm keeping are Kessel, Kadri, van Riemsdyk, Frattin, and Gardiner.
bustaheims said:TML fan said:But we are looking for top 5 picks right? So if the idea is to get a top 5 pick, wouldn't it make more sense to trade everyone else, and keep Kessel? He's one of our youngest players.
If we are looking to blow up the team, the only players I'm keeping are Kessel, Kadri, van Riemsdyk, Frattin, and Gardiner.
I guess it depends on what sort of direction Nonis and co. are planning on taking. If we're talking complete blow up, I'd actually take Kessel off that list, simply because he'd bring back the best return in terms of rebuilding from a barebones POV. If they're just looking to get things back on track, I'd add Lupul, Grabovski, Gunnarsson, Phaneuf and Kulemin to that list. And, of course, any of the prospects still in junior would be completely off limits unless a true elite talent under the age of 25 is coming back.
bustaheims said:TML fan said:But we are looking for top 5 picks right? So if the idea is to get a top 5 pick, wouldn't it make more sense to trade everyone else, and keep Kessel? He's one of our youngest players.
If we are looking to blow up the team, the only players I'm keeping are Kessel, Kadri, van Riemsdyk, Frattin, and Gardiner.
I guess it depends on what sort of direction Nonis and co. are planning on taking. If we're talking complete blow up, I'd actually take Kessel off that list, simply because he'd bring back the best return in terms of rebuilding from a barebones POV. If they're just looking to get things back on track, I'd add Lupul, Grabovski, Gunnarsson, Phaneuf and Kulemin to that list. And, of course, any of the prospects still in junior would be completely off limits unless a true elite talent under the age of 25 is coming back.