• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Red Wings @ Leafs - Dec. 23rd, 7:30pm - SN, Fan 590

bustaheims said:
Also, potential silver lining from Nylander struggling - other RFAs will look at how his numbers aren't reflective of where they want to be and the amount of less that ideal attention he gets from the media, and maybe they'll be more open to settling a little to get a deal done sooner rather the risking missing too much of training camp or the beginning of the season.

Heh, interesting take. I'd think that if this was true, it would be a cautionary tale for all RFAs around the league, not just on the Leafs.
 
Nylander and Marner are different players. At even strength, there?s an argument that Nylander was better last year. However, Nylander was a year older and that makes a difference...
 
Arn said:
Probably not going to be able to catch this one live tonight so I hope the Leafs can give us an early Christmas present and sign off for the break with a win.

And let me take this chance to wish all my Leafs brethren from wherever on the globe you may be a thoroughly happy and enjoyable Christmas break!

Same to you, Arn.
 
Well, I think herman your position on Nylander is the most charitable it can be. 

As for him being behind despite now having a reasonable number of games under his belt, it's not just that he's not playing as well as we would expect him to normally.  He's not even playing as well as players who are fall less talented on teams that aren't anywhere near playoff caliber.  I expected him to start making some headway these last 2-3 games.  If anything, he regressed.  Hopefully tonight he'll snap back to his baseline.

Anyway, at some point his being "behind" or "out of sync" no longer cuts it as an excuse.  It's a matter of opinion, but mine is that he'll be reaching that point very soon.
 
princedpw said:
Nylander and Marner are different players. At even strength, there?s an argument that Nylander was better last year. However, Nylander was a year older and that makes a difference...
Nylander got Matthews all last season and benefited from it. This is the first time Marner has had an equivalent opportunity.

As good as Naz is, he just doesn't think the game at the same level that Marner does and it took a long time for them to sort things out (including Mitch spending some time on the 4th line). This year Mitch has gotten a steady diet of Tavares, and as much as it often looks like Marner's driving the bus there's a huge part of that coming from John's "threat level" and that he's consistently in the right place at the right time for Mitch to work his magic. When you have two elite players on the same page, magic happens.

I'd really like to see Nylander put back on Matthews' wing for a few games, with Kapanen shifted over to the opposite wing and push Marleau down with Naz and Brown. If they do this for some home games they can give Matthews' line more sheltered minutes and use John and Naz's lines against the opponents' top two lines. That might help inspire Willy while also test-driving Kappy on his off wing.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Well, I think herman your position on Nylander is the most charitable it can be. 

As for him being behind despite now having a reasonable number of games under his belt, it's not just that he's not playing as well as we would expect him to normally.  He's not even playing as well as players who are fall less talented on teams that aren't anywhere near playoff caliber.  I expected him to start making some headway these last 2-3 games.  If anything, he regressed.  Hopefully tonight he'll snap back to his baseline.

Anyway, at some point his being "behind" or "out of sync" no longer cuts it as an excuse.  It's a matter of opinion, but mine is that he'll be reaching that point very soon.

You know where you can put your opinion? On an internet discussion forum to have a cordial conversation about it.

So let's take a bit of a looksee what what Nylander is producing:
I was going to do my own research, but someone else is all up in this already.
https://twitter.com/SteveBurtch/status/1076535319820812289
https://twitter.com/SteveBurtch/status/1076538804897341440
https://twitter.com/SteveBurtch/status/1076540126195462144

You can call my take as charitable as you'd like, as long as you don't call it merely an opinion. The coaching staff and former players with a platform have all said as much; it's going to take time to really get going, and putting in the work and getting back that confidence will play a big part in doing so.

The Leafs are in a good spot either way and can be very patient about Matthews and Nylander getting back up to full speed. When will I be less patient about it? Probably late January. So far, I haven't seen any real cause for concern even though I'm also disappointed by the lack of giffable moments.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Anyway, at some point his being "behind" or "out of sync" no longer cuts it as an excuse.  It's a matter of opinion, but mine is that he'll be reaching that point very soon.

I certainly don't disagree with this but I also just don't think 8 games is nearly enough. I tried searching for this but there was an article where Babcock said his sports science people told him how much time it would take for Nylander to get fully up to speed and I'm pretty sure the time-frame ended up being somewhere in January. I tried searching for that article, but couldn't find it anywhere. If someone remembers it please re-post. Anyway, regardless Nylander didn't just forget how to hockey. If it takes longer than we all expected then so be it. Quite frankly as long as he's at 100% in playoffs that's all that really matters.
 
herman said:
You can call my take as charitable as you'd like, as long as you don't call it merely an opinion.

Herm, I love your posts, but everyone's take here is opinion, nothing more, even if a billion stats monkeys bang out backup along with a copy of Hamlet.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I certainly don't disagree with this but I also just don't think 8 games is nearly enough. I tried searching for this but there was an article where Babcock said his sports science people told him how much time it would take for Nylander to get fully up to speed and I'm pretty sure the time-frame ended up being somewhere in January. I tried searching for that article, but couldn't find it anywhere. If someone remembers it please re-post. Anyway, regardless Nylander didn't just forget how to hockey. If it takes longer than we all expected then so be it. Quite frankly as long as he's at 100% in playoffs that's all that really matters.

https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2018/12/12/mike-babcock-post-game-leafs-4-vs-hurricanes-1-we-had-a-real-good-penalty-kill-here-tonight/

On whether Nylander?s game and fitness are where he thought they?d be at this point three games into his return:

I mean, we knew it was going to take some time for sure. I actually spent time with Jeremy [Bettle], the sports science guy, tonight, trying to figure out ? just in training camp, when you?ve trained all summer and you?ve come back ? how many days it takes you to get your heart and all of that level. We were working on that tonight to figure that out. It?s not as quick as you?d like to think.

On how long it takes to get your heart rate level:

We did it today. When everyone is through, it?s 12 days before it levels out after training camp. If you think about that, you?ve trained, you?re in shape, you?re ready to go, and you?ve been with the team for a month, basically. It takes some time.

Babcock calls it 12 days but I think he means games after training camp.
 
Frycer14 said:
herman said:
You can call my take as charitable as you'd like, as long as you don't call it merely an opinion.

Herm, I love your posts, but everyone's take here is opinion, nothing more, even if a billion stats monkeys bang out backup along with a copy of Hamlet.

Some people go to the trouble of forming their opinions into arguments, i.e. opinions supported with factual basis. A discussion of opinions alone nets everyone nothing.
 
herman said:
Frycer14 said:
herman said:
You can call my take as charitable as you'd like, as long as you don't call it merely an opinion.

Herm, I love your posts, but everyone's take here is opinion, nothing more, even if a billion stats monkeys bang out backup along with a copy of Hamlet.

Some people go to the trouble of forming their opinions into arguments, i.e. opinions supported with factual basis. A discussion of opinions alone nets everyone nothing.

No doubt about the entertainment value, but a well argued opinion is still just that. 
 
Frycer14 said:
herman said:
Frycer14 said:
herman said:
You can call my take as charitable as you'd like, as long as you don't call it merely an opinion.

Herm, I love your posts, but everyone's take here is opinion, nothing more, even if a billion stats monkeys bang out backup along with a copy of Hamlet.

Some people go to the trouble of forming their opinions into arguments, i.e. opinions supported with factual basis. A discussion of opinions alone nets everyone nothing.

No doubt about the entertainment value, but a well argued opinion is still just that. 

I do believe we are working off a different set of definitions then.
 
https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1076993237003526144

IT'SHAPPENINGEVENMORE.gif

Edit: sometimes Babcock just writes down a lineup for line rushes and then deploys something different.
 
That?s a nice goal caused by Nylander?s forecheck win. For which he gets 0 pts. Rielly gets an easy apple though.

https://twitter.com/leafsnews/status/1077001618170802182
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top