• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

The Official Complaint Thread!

bustaheims said:
My guess is this rule made little to no impact on the situation they were trying to deal with, because it doesn't deal with the bullying at all.

Well, it would certainly make an impact on the use of the word which is what I'm talking about here. Honestly, I really pity the person who doesn't see how it's a slur.
 
SGT said:
And much to my original point, I suspect a lot of people would have the same issue 40 or more years ago with the use of the "N" word or similar slurs.

You are being absurd. A racial slur is not the equivalent of childish name calling.
 
Tigger said:
Kick a ginger day is more offensive to you than kick a red head day? It's the exact same thing to me.

If I was a kid in that school and could get sent to the office for saying ginger I'd do it every day, just to protest how truly absurd that is, then I'd start screaming about auburn inequality.

They'd be  equally offensive if "kick a red-head day" actually existed... and good thing you're not a kid anymore then I guess.
 
hap_leaf said:
In this case, using a term to invoke a negative response to gain feelings of superiority over another.

Right. Nobody is saying that's ok. The issue is whether or not specific words make that action worse or if the word, entirely divorced from the actions, is in and of itself worthy of punishment. Kids have lots of words to use to make other kids feel bad that can be based on anything or based on nothing. The distinction being made is between the words and the actions.
 
hap_leaf said:
That is absurd.  You can't separate the perpatrator and their actions.  They are one in the same.  In this case, using a term to invoke a negative response to gain feelings of superiority over another.  It is irrelevant if you agree that the term has negative connotations.

When you ban a word, you're not punishing the perpetrator for their actions. If a kid is bullying another kid with the word ginger, then, absolutely, punish the kid for that action - and that action is bullying, regardless of the words that were used. If that kid can't say ginger, they'll find something else they can say, because it's not about the words they're using but, like you said, trying to invoke a response and gain a feeling of superiority. Banning the word is separating the actions from the perpetrator. It's reacting to the effect rather than the cause.
 
SGT said:
Well, it would certainly make an impact on the use of the word which is what I'm talking about here. Honestly, I really pity the person who doesn't see how it's a slur.

But, it still doesn't deal with the actual problem, which is bullying.

And, honestly, as a slur, ginger is, at worst, on par with calling an African black or a calling Jewish person a Jew. It's only a slur if there is hatred behind it, otherwise, it's just a descriptor.
 
SGT said:
... and it usually isn't used any other way unless we're talkin' food here.

That's just completely untrue. To me and just about everyone I know, a ginger is just a person with specific external features. Like with the term black, only a small segment of small minded people use it as a slur.
 
SGT said:
No. I don't think I am. A slur is a slur and "ginger" alienates an entire genetic lineage.

It doesn't represent hundreds of years of oppression, murder and dehumanization. It isn't the basis for legally entrenched systemic discrimination or prejudice. It has no connection to some of the most monstrous acts in human history. That is what you are comparing it to. You are comparing it to words that represented an attitude that it was alright to buy and sell other people as property. To rape and murder them and treat them as farm animals. That is what the particular ethnic slur you've chosen to equate "ginger" to means.

Not hurt feelings on a playground. Not something being used in place of hundreds of other stupid things a kid can say. Not something that, as this thread has shown, isn't even universally agreed upon as to whether or not it's particularly offensive amongst the people being "slurred".

Get a hold of yourself here.
 
SGT said:
Tigger said:
Kick a ginger day is more offensive to you than kick a red head day? It's the exact same thing to me.

If I was a kid in that school and could get sent to the office for saying ginger I'd do it every day, just to protest how truly absurd that is, then I'd start screaming about auburn inequality.

They'd be  equally offensive if "kick a red-head day" actually existed... and good thing you're not a kid anymore then I guess.

Why, because I'd be thinking for myself and challenging the notion that the word itself is bad rather than the bullying that started it? In fact I'd start a 'kick a Burnsy day' just to get the point across and have them try to ban auburn, red head and ginger.

Heck, I'd try to get chromosome 16 banned while I was at it, just to show how ridiculous it is.

Ginger has been used to describe red hair for a long, long time. I can certainly understand not wanting to be bullied or experience hatred because of your hair colour but that has nothing to do with the word itself.

I mean, what, using 'ginger' is going to make MIA's video come true?
 
Nik? said:
SGT said:
No. I don't think I am. A slur is a slur and "ginger" alienates an entire genetic lineage.

It doesn't represent hundreds of years of oppression, murder and dehumanization. It isn't the basis for legally entrenched systemic discrimination or prejudice. It has no connection to some of the most monstrous acts in human history. That is what you are comparing it to. You are comparing it to words that represented an attitude that it was alright to buy and sell other people as property. To rape and murder them and treat them as farm animals. That is what the particular ethnic slur you've chosen to equate "ginger" to means.

Not hurt feelings on a playground. Not something being used in place of hundreds of other stupid things a kid can say. Not something that, as this thread has shown, isn't even universally agreed upon as to whether or not it's particularly offensive amongst the people being insulted.

Get a hold of yourself here.

Well, if you cares to actually read the thread you'll see the post where I said "fine" it was a slur more like something else... I don't think I'm the one in need of holding here.
 
SGT said:
Well, if you cares to actually read the thread you'll see the post where I said "fine" it was a slur more like something else... I don't think I'm the one in need of holding here.

I did read that. Then I read after, in reply #897, you again ludicrously equating ginger to the N-Word which prompted my response.

Seriously. You could be making a legitimate point here about the need to curb bullying but instead you've decided to take a position that is ridiculous on it's face. It doesn't matter why a kid is getting bullied. Efforts should be taken to stop it. Kids using a word that many people, as evidenced by this thread, view as benign to bully someone else does not make that word the equivalent of racial slurs. You are embarrassing yourself by saying otherwise.
 
In casual conversation, I've never experienced "Ginger" as a socially acceptable term.  Never had anyone ask me to kindly take a beer over to "the Ginger" or asked "Have you seen a Ginger come by recently?".  And I think this is because people are unsure of its place in society.

I've only experienced this as a semi-derogatory term, the source of funny websites about "gingervitis" (and the South Park episode).  So I can see why someone with red hair would find it awkward.  Should they have the final say if it is offensive or not? 
 
Nik? said:
You are embarrassing yourself by saying otherwise.

I don't like the slur. It's in poor taste and the level to which it might be compared to is up for debate. Seriously, how can I be embarrassing myself when I believe I'm right? 
 
SGT said:
I don't like the slur. It's in poor taste and the level to which it might be compared to is up for debate.

Sure it's up for debate. As we've seen in this thread, people are more than comfortable debating whether or not it's offensive at all. Do you think the same would be true with any racial slurs? In particular the one you won't even type because of how offensive it is? Think there's anyone who's going to chime in with "Yeah, you know, I've always thought of using the N-word to describe black people as kind of benign".

SGT said:
Seriously, how can I be embarrassing myself when I believe I'm right?

Because embarrassing yourself doesn't necessarily refer to how you view yourself or the actions you're taking.
 
hap_leaf said:
I've only experienced this as a semi-derogatory term, the source of funny websites about "gingervitis" (and the South Park episode).  So I can see why someone with red hair would find it awkward.

Ok, but not everyone is going to take their cues from funny websites and South Park episodes. I'm willing to be that using "ginger" as a descriptive term without malice is probably hundreds of years old.
 
SGT said:
hap_leaf said:
So I can see why someone with red hair would find it awkward.  Should they have the final say if it is offensive or not?

Yes, absolutely.

Then why choose to view it as offensive? If you chose to view it as inoffensive, the word loses all of its power to hurt you, and becomes meaningless.

 
hap_leaf said:
So I can see why someone with red hair would find it awkward.  Should they have the final say if it is offensive or not?

Sure, but, as we've seen evidenced by this thread and by many of us in our day to day lives, even redheads as a group can't agree on whether it's offensive or not, with the majority seemingly leaning towards not.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top