Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Potvin29 said:I feel like that would just make the situation more ridiculous - like the example you provided of the Leafs somehow gaining a number of points from it. That wouldn't be good for the Leafs or for the integrity of the league if the game could have such a drastic impact. It would also be confusing and throw a wrench into evaluating teams - part of the reason the season is so long is that over that many games the better teams and the worse teams should become clear (or clearer).
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:My main point is that unless you provide some real, standings-affecting incentive tied to the outcome of the game, it can never rise above the level of a sideshow, with tawdry little episodes like Ovie's bailing, and major snafus like the Scott imbroglio. It really has gotten to the point that they need to pull the plug unless they come up with something, well, radical.
Nik the Trik said:Toews isn't going either. Replaced by James Neal.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/hockey/blackhawks/ct-jonathan-toews-all-star-game-20160128-story.html
CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:My main point is that unless you provide some real, standings-affecting incentive tied to the outcome of the game, it can never rise above the level of a sideshow, with tawdry little episodes like Ovie's bailing, and major snafus like the Scott imbroglio. It really has gotten to the point that they need to pull the plug unless they come up with something, well, radical.
I find it a teeny-tiny bit funny that you're willing to let the All-Star game determine who potentially makes the playoffs but making the nets an inch or two bigger fundamentally changes the game of hockey.
bustaheims said:I'd like to see them drop the whole "every team has to be represented in the game" thing. Every team should have a player that participates in the broader All Star festivities, but the game itself should just be the best of the best. Let the other teams have their rep in things like the Young Stars game, or have guys there that are only participating in the skills competition. It may not improve fan interest all that much, but at least it will really be an all-star game, rather than a "some stars, and some other guys who are there because we have to have one guy from each team."
Potvin29 said:Well...gotta admit this impacts my view of the whole thing: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/a-guy-like-me/
CarltonTheBear said:Potvin29 said:Well...gotta admit this impacts my view of the whole thing: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/a-guy-like-me/
Awesome article.
I can't believe somebody from the NHL seriously called John Scott and said "Do you think this is something your kids would be proud of?"
Potvin29 said:Well...gotta admit this impacts my view of the whole thing: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/a-guy-like-me/
CarltonTheBear said:Awesome article.
I can't believe somebody from the NHL seriously called John Scott and said "Do you think this is something your kids would be proud of?"
Potvin29 said:Well...gotta admit this impacts my view of the whole thing: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/a-guy-like-me/
Potvin29 said:Well...gotta admit this impacts my view of the whole thing: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/a-guy-like-me/
CarltonTheBear said:Potvin29 said:Well...gotta admit this impacts my view of the whole thing: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/a-guy-like-me/
Awesome article.
I can't believe somebody from the NHL seriously called John Scott and said "Do you think this is something your kids would be proud of?"
Potvin29 said:Well...gotta admit this impacts my view of the whole thing: http://www.theplayerstribune.com/a-guy-like-me/