Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bender said:Sandin is a loss, but hardly a "big" one. I'll eat my words if he becomes Stralman 2.0 but I really don't see it. And even so I do think adding McCabe and removing Sandin makes you a better team to win now.
cw said:Some of this doesn't make sense to me yet.
To me, as I posted before, Engvall or Kerfoot was a given to get under the cap when Murray returns.
Getting a 3rd for Engvall seems like fair value.
That trade was a necessity in the wake of the others.
That alone made room for Murray's return off LTIR and signing Knies.
I'm ok to this point.
Gustafsson? A knock on the Leafs D might be that they lack scoring. I believe it looks worse than it is because they've been using a 4th forward on the PP. So he wanted a more offensive dman? He got one but I doubt he is as good defensively. And I don't like the return given where they are right now - a window of this year and next to win a Cup with this group. Next year Gustavsson is gone or UFA expensive. Sandin made good progress this year and would likely have been better next year. I don't care for this deal. Not something I would have done. Take them years to develop the pick unless they flip that pick.
Schenn. Depth? ok But where are all these dmen going to play. We have 9 on the roster and Benn in the AHL? Another trade coming?
We have a top 4 NHL team with significant turnover. Whatever team chemistry they had, it has been rattled. A lot of these guys are friends with each other. He's removed Anderson, Benn, Engvall & Sandin and added Schenn, Gustavsson, O'Reilly, McCabe, Acciari & Lafferty - 6 players with Knies as a potential 7th. Offhand, I can't recall seeing anything quite like that just prior to the trade deadline.
He's removed 2 regular players, that's it. They'll be fine and they'll get over it pretty quickly. They're pros.cw said:We have a top 4 NHL team with significant turnover. Whatever team chemistry they had, it has been rattled. A lot of these guys are friends with each other. He's removed Anderson, Benn, Engvall & Sandin and added Schenn, Gustavsson, O'Reilly, McCabe, Acciari & Lafferty - 6 players with Knies as a potential 7th. Offhand, I can't recall seeing anything quite like that just prior to the trade deadline.
Guilt Trip said:He's removed 2 regular players, that's it. They'll be fine and they'll get over it pretty quickly. They're pros.cw said:We have a top 4 NHL team with significant turnover. Whatever team chemistry they had, it has been rattled. A lot of these guys are friends with each other. He's removed Anderson, Benn, Engvall & Sandin and added Schenn, Gustavsson, O'Reilly, McCabe, Acciari & Lafferty - 6 players with Knies as a potential 7th. Offhand, I can't recall seeing anything quite like that just prior to the trade deadline.
Maybe but keep in mind the Leafs have enough space to sign Knies and have Murray on the roster right now.Zee said:Guilt Trip said:He's removed 2 regular players, that's it. They'll be fine and they'll get over it pretty quickly. They're pros.cw said:We have a top 4 NHL team with significant turnover. Whatever team chemistry they had, it has been rattled. A lot of these guys are friends with each other. He's removed Anderson, Benn, Engvall & Sandin and added Schenn, Gustavsson, O'Reilly, McCabe, Acciari & Lafferty - 6 players with Knies as a potential 7th. Offhand, I can't recall seeing anything quite like that just prior to the trade deadline.
I don't think he's done.
Bender said:cw said:Some of this doesn't make sense to me yet.
To me, as I posted before, Engvall or Kerfoot was a given to get under the cap when Murray returns.
Getting a 3rd for Engvall seems like fair value.
That trade was a necessity in the wake of the others.
That alone made room for Murray's return off LTIR and signing Knies.
I'm ok to this point.
Gustafsson? A knock on the Leafs D might be that they lack scoring. I believe it looks worse than it is because they've been using a 4th forward on the PP. So he wanted a more offensive dman? He got one but I doubt he is as good defensively. And I don't like the return given where they are right now - a window of this year and next to win a Cup with this group. Next year Gustavsson is gone or UFA expensive. Sandin made good progress this year and would likely have been better next year. I don't care for this deal. Not something I would have done. Take them years to develop the pick unless they flip that pick.
Schenn. Depth? ok But where are all these dmen going to play. We have 9 on the roster and Benn in the AHL? Another trade coming?
We have a top 4 NHL team with significant turnover. Whatever team chemistry they had, it has been rattled. A lot of these guys are friends with each other. He's removed Anderson, Benn, Engvall & Sandin and added Schenn, Gustavsson, O'Reilly, McCabe, Acciari & Lafferty - 6 players with Knies as a potential 7th. Offhand, I can't recall seeing anything quite like that just prior to the trade deadline.
I understand the chemistry bit, but these guys are professionals. I'm not overly concerned about chemistry as much as being playoff hardened. Engvall hardly did anything in any playoff round. At any rate, I don't think the Leafs are done. Let's see the post deadline roster before we do the autopsy.
cw said:Odds are probably against Dubas. I don't like everything he's done. But I don't blame him a bit for trying. If I were in his boots, I'd be swinging for the fences too.
Pat Quinn had a pretty busy deadline in 2004 when the Leafs were going to replace him as GM. But I think this one surpasses that.
Zee said:cw said:Odds are probably against Dubas. I don't like everything he's done. But I don't blame him a bit for trying. If I were in his boots, I'd be swinging for the fences too.
Pat Quinn had a pretty busy deadline in 2004 when the Leafs were going to replace him as GM. But I think this one surpasses that.
There's still two and a half days until the deadline too, and I don't think he's finished. This is nuts.
If Murray's good to go, the Leafs have around 925K in cap space with a 23 man roster. They can sign Knies anytime after the deadline when rosters expand.cw said:Zee said:cw said:Odds are probably against Dubas. I don't like everything he's done. But I don't blame him a bit for trying. If I were in his boots, I'd be swinging for the fences too.
Pat Quinn had a pretty busy deadline in 2004 when the Leafs were going to replace him as GM. But I think this one surpasses that.
There's still two and a half days until the deadline too, and I don't think he's finished. This is nuts.
9 D with Benn in the AHL and Mete on LTIR.
I can go along with maybe 8 but 9?
I can't make sense of what he has in mind there.
I think Rielly is untouchable with his contract - not his best season.
Giordano has been amazing.
He's crazy if he goes near Liljegren.
I think Brodie has been fine.
He just got McCabe in the top 4.
So he's got Gustavsson, Schenn, Holl & Timmins fighting over the 6th spot unless they're going with 7 D.
Someone has to go. He just got Gustavsson and Schenn. Looks like UFA Holl or Timmins (though he extended recently).
Guilt Trip said:If Murray's good to go, the pop Leafs have around 925K in cap space with a 23 man roster. They can sign Knies anytime after the deadline when rosters expand.cw said:Zee said:cw said:Odds are probably against Dubas. I don't like everything he's done. But I don't blame him a bit for trying. If I were in his boots, I'd be swinging for the fences too.
Pat Quinn had a pretty busy deadline in 2004 when the Leafs were going to replace him as GM. But I think this one surpasses that.
There's still two and a half days until the deadline too, and I don't think he's finished. This is nuts.
9 D with Benn in the AHL and Mete on LTIR.
I can go along with maybe 8 but 9?
I can't make sense of what he has in mind there.
I think Rielly is untouchable with his contract - not his best season.
Giordano has been amazing.
He's crazy if he goes near Liljegren.
I think Brodie has been fine.
He just got McCabe in the top 4.
So he's got Gustavsson, Schenn, Holl & Timmins fighting over the 6th spot unless they're going with 7 D.
Someone has to go. He just got Gustavsson and Schenn. Looks like UFA Holl or Timmins (though he extended recently).
They actually don't need to do anything. The one thing Holl has going for him is PKing. He's our best PKing Damn, like it or not and that has value. Injuries are going to happen and remember when Rielly, Brodie and Muzz we're all out at the same time?
Nik said:Apart from everything else it's kind of nice to see Schenn coming back. For a guy who was unfairly burdened with expectations I was always rooting for him and he's seemed to carve out a really solid career for himself as a 3rd pairing guy so value proposition aside I do like the move from a strict fan-sense. NIK GRADE: B+
I'm effectively ok with the Sandin trade. I think there's a real chance he turns into a good player but I think in today's NHL the real question you have to ask in a scenario like this is whether or not there's any chance he becomes the kind of player you can't sign for an equivalent $$$ amount on the UFA market or acquire via trade for comparable assets. To me, that seems less likely. That said, I really don't like giving up on talented young players and I don't know that I see the wisdom here yet in terms of the team being appreciably better going into the playoffs. NIK GRADE: B-
With Engvall, I sort of think we'd reached the end of the rope with him in terms of seeing if he'd turn into the sort of 3rd liner who could fetch a bigger return. Sadly, he just never rounded into a real defensive specialist or a guy with offensive upside so, again, it's not so much a question of whether or not he's "worth" a third rounder as most 3rd round picks don't turn into NHL regulars but if we have to go into the off-season could we, every year, bargain shop and effectively replace him? I think we can. NIK GRADE: C
Bill_Berg_is_sad said:I think the sum of these trades needs to be considered for judgement, but that being said, I don't think Dubas is finished.
gunnar36 said:I overall like these moves, though I still feel that Engvall had a lot more to offer to this lineup as a 3rd liner then Calle Jarnkrok does. Considering Jarnkrok netted the Preds a 2nd, 3rd and 7th to go to Flames at last years deadline, it feels a little underwhelming getting only a 3rd for Engvall.
Although Engvall played too soft for his size, he was difficult to play against with his length and reach, often causing turnovers and you cant undervalue those strengths in playoff hockey. His game and confidence seemd to be growing as the season has progressed and he will be an asset to Isles.
To me, Jarnkrok seems to have that Mike Craig syndrome where he always shows hustle and body parts seemingly move fast but somehow he does not get from A to B that quickly overall. I would dump him for a draft pick and let a Holmberg, McMann (or Knies?!?), take his spot