ZBBM
Active member
Hobbes said:And maybe even moreso in net...if Freddie has any sort of injury issues we're in trouble.Nik the Trik said:bustaheims said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I suppose this reduces to the old argument about picking for need vs. BPA. Of course, by the time you get to even as as high 53rd pick in the draft the demonstrable talent differences between the players available are already narrowing, and by the later rounds it is, as I think everyone would agree, a crap shoot. Seems to me that you might use at least a few of the lower picks to address gaps in the system, since the chances of any of them panning out are low.
Those gaps in the system can be addressed by trading our crap shoots that pan out for other teams? crapshoots that pan out. And, if you want the best odds of a crapshoot panning out, you take those that you think have the highest ceiling rather than specific attributes. In the draft, you always always need to be looking for guys who will provide maximum value as assets. Trade to fill need, draft to fill value.
It's also pretty debatable that grinding, physical wingers with size is a big weakness in the system right now with guys like Marchment and Engvall and so on. Honestly, I look at the system and the things that stick out as real problems is just a general dearth of talent and especially down the middle.
Trouble as in "sunk." Unless a Binnington emerges.