Bullfrog
Active member
Peter D. said:Bullfrog said:Well that's just flat out wrong. Halting things for 4 weeks will absolutely make a difference, even with lower noncompliance. Halting for 6 weeks, is significantly better.
This is my struggle -- okay, cases drop. Setting aside and forgetting about the impact that more jobs will be lost and businesses will be shut down permanently because of this round of lockdown. Cases are below 1,000 as the models suggest. Then what? Open things up again...send our kids back to school...expand our bubbles...
Will that not just cause the numbers to creep up again? Then on to Round 3 of lockdowns?
That's certainly possible; but without the lockdown we're going to run out of ICU beds and ICU trained professionals. While it might cycle up and down, we can not let the rates increase beyond what they are. We can't eliminate this threat without the vaccines, but we can try to keep it manageable.
People are dying horrible, lonely deaths. While jobs may be lost and businesses closed, we can prevent people from dying.