Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TheMightyOdin said:cw said:This one got me:
Picture of 8 year old lost provided by his teacher
Some pictures are worth a thousand words. This one is worth much more.
Sarrrge said:Now they're reporting this is not the case... Lots of conflicting reports right now.
Rick said:Breaking News: CNN is now reporting that reports of a reported arrest are inaccurate. Never fear, they will soon report on the reporter who initially broke the reported story. Reportedly.
Erndog said:Sarrrge said:Now they're reporting this is not the case... Lots of conflicting reports right now.
Why would they report something if they weren't 100% sure it was accurate?
Is that typical practice for CNN? Jumping the gun a bit?
Sarrrge said:Erndog said:Sarrrge said:Now they're reporting this is not the case... Lots of conflicting reports right now.
Today's news brought to you by the once deceased Gordon Lightfoot.
Why would they report something if they weren't 100% sure it was accurate?
Is that typical practice for CNN? Jumping the gun a bit?
They're actually said they had both local and federal sources so I think it was fair for them to tell people what their sources told them... Next time they may want to get additional sources.
Sarrrge said:They're actually said they had both local and federal sources so I think it was fair for them to tell people what their sources told them... Next time they may want to get additional sources.
Nik said:Sarrrge said:They're actually said they had both local and federal sources so I think it was fair for them to tell people what their sources told them... Next time they may want to get additional sources.
But who are those sources? That's the sort of thing that's really declined as a standard of journalism and speaks to what LHF was saying. In a race to be first over responsible reporting, CNN decided to use sources that couldn't be held accountable when their information turned out to be wrong. If they had said John Smith with the FBI(or whatever) then A)the public would have a legitimate option to weigh the source's credibility and B) someone would be called to task if their information proved incorrect.
Good journalists will only use an anonymous source in a case where the secrecy is necessary, like Watergate. These days anonymity is just traded for access which is seen as necessary because, as LHF says, people put speed over accuracy. By using an anonymous source you're essentially asking the public to trust you and when it goes wrong the blowback is on you. That's why CNN doesn't have a glittering reputation for journalism.
Sarrrge said:Stay safe... Now why would they go on this spree afterwards as opposed to keeping a low profile?