Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
caveman said:Does that mean that poor McIntyre will leave the Marlies ?
bustaheims said:caveman said:Does that mean that poor McIntyre will leave the Marlies ?
Maybe, but, it could also mean that Owuya heads to the ECHL. He's struggled with the Marlies this season.
x.jr.benchwarmer said:Reimer obviously had a bad 1st and 2nd period, (as well as the shoot-out) against the Penguins last night. But he played well in the third period, keeping the Leafs close.
Scrivens has more upside, IMHO. He has better quickness, and normally sees the puck a bit better. And, notwithstanding his awkward style, his glove hand is stronger.
It was interesting hearing from the commentators that the "book" on Reimer is to shoot it high. I really don't think that it is much of a secret, since his glove is not that good, nor has it ever looked that good. Even when he had that terrific run 2 years ago, the opposition was always trying to shoot it high on him. And it wasn't really all that fair watching Reimer in the shoot-out against Crosby since he was just overmatched trying to stop that high shot with his glove. In fact, it may be doubtful that Reimer can play at an excellent level for the entire year, given his glove, and suspect puck-handling, and bad rebound control.
But hopefully Scrivens will be able to play a significant number of games at a reasonably high level. The Leafs have had a terrific year, for their talent-level, principally because of solid goaltending, and hopefully we won't have to be stuck with a goaltender playing regularly who isn't playing well, like it has been for about the past 5 years or so.
x.jr.benchwarmer said:It was interesting hearing from the commentators that the "book" on Reimer is to shoot it high.
Potvin29 said:x.jr.benchwarmer said:It was interesting hearing from the commentators that the "book" on Reimer is to shoot it high.
I laugh when I hear those kinds of comments. The "book" on almost every goalie is to shoot it high.
x.jr.benchwarmer said:Reimer obviously had a bad 1st and 2nd period, (as well as the shoot-out) against the Penguins last night.
x.jr.benchwarmer said:Reimer obviously had a bad 1st and 2nd period, (as well as the shoot-out) against the Penguins last night. But he played well in the third period, keeping the Leafs close.
Scrivens has more upside, IMHO. He has better quickness, and normally sees the puck a bit better. And, notwithstanding his awkward style, his glove hand is stronger.
It was interesting hearing from the commentators that the "book" on Reimer is to shoot it high. I really don't think that it is much of a secret, since his glove is not that good, nor has it ever looked that good. Even when he had that terrific run 2 years ago, the opposition was always trying to shoot it high on him. And it wasn't really all that fair watching Reimer in the shoot-out against Crosby since he was just overmatched trying to stop that high shot with his glove. In fact, it may be doubtful that Reimer can play at an excellent level for the entire year, given his glove, and suspect puck-handling, and bad rebound control.
But hopefully Scrivens will be able to play a significant number of games at a reasonably high level. The Leafs have had a terrific year, for their talent-level, principally because of solid goaltending, and hopefully we won't have to be stuck with a goaltender playing regularly who isn't playing well, like it has been for about the past 5 years or so.
wc17 said:x.jr.benchwarmer said:Reimer obviously had a bad 1st and 2nd period, (as well as the shoot-out) against the Penguins last night. But he played well in the third period, keeping the Leafs close.
Scrivens has more upside, IMHO. He has better quickness, and normally sees the puck a bit better. And, notwithstanding his awkward style, his glove hand is stronger.
It was interesting hearing from the commentators that the "book" on Reimer is to shoot it high. I really don't think that it is much of a secret, since his glove is not that good, nor has it ever looked that good. Even when he had that terrific run 2 years ago, the opposition was always trying to shoot it high on him. And it wasn't really all that fair watching Reimer in the shoot-out against Crosby since he was just overmatched trying to stop that high shot with his glove. In fact, it may be doubtful that Reimer can play at an excellent level for the entire year, given his glove, and suspect puck-handling, and bad rebound control.
But hopefully Scrivens will be able to play a significant number of games at a reasonably high level. The Leafs have had a terrific year, for their talent-level, principally because of solid goaltending, and hopefully we won't have to be stuck with a goaltender playing regularly who isn't playing well, like it has been for about the past 5 years or so.
I totally agree with you that Reims gets a lot more slack then Scrivens does by the fans. Is it fair, probably not...but oh well.
As of right now, Reimer is calm and quiet in the net, has better rebound control and is a better puck handler then Scrivens...
I find it crazy that you say that Scrivens has more upside then a guy that is better overall then him right now, and is 2 years younger...
Some more tweaks in Reimers style (getting him more upright and out at the top of the crease more) and I think we have a real good goalie for years to come...
Potvin29 said:I'm not seeing the Scrivens-bashing that is being talked about.
leafplasma said:Potvin29 said:I'm not seeing the Scrivens-bashing that is being talked about.
Hardly bashing just not the same fanfare Reimer gets and it is unjust.
Potvin29 said:leafplasma said:Potvin29 said:I'm not seeing the Scrivens-bashing that is being talked about.
Hardly bashing just not the same fanfare Reimer gets and it is unjust.
Not really. Scrivens has had a far smaller sample size for people to judge him on in the NHL, so between the two it makes sense for more people to be excited about the younger goalie who has played more.
wc17 said:x.jr.benchwarmer said:Reimer obviously had a bad 1st and 2nd period, (as well as the shoot-out) against the Penguins last night. But he played well in the third period, keeping the Leafs close.
Scrivens has more upside, IMHO. He has better quickness, and normally sees the puck a bit better. And, notwithstanding his awkward style, his glove hand is stronger.
It was interesting hearing from the commentators that the "book" on Reimer is to shoot it high. I really don't think that it is much of a secret, since his glove is not that good, nor has it ever looked that good. Even when he had that terrific run 2 years ago, the opposition was always trying to shoot it high on him. And it wasn't really all that fair watching Reimer in the shoot-out against Crosby since he was just overmatched trying to stop that high shot with his glove. In fact, it may be doubtful that Reimer can play at an excellent level for the entire year, given his glove, and suspect puck-handling, and bad rebound control.
But hopefully Scrivens will be able to play a significant number of games at a reasonably high level. The Leafs have had a terrific year, for their talent-level, principally because of solid goaltending, and hopefully we won't have to be stuck with a goaltender playing regularly who isn't playing well, like it has been for about the past 5 years or so.
I totally agree with you that Reims gets a lot more slack then Scrivens does by the fans. Is it fair, probably not...but oh well.
As of right now, Reimer is calm and quiet in the net, has better rebound control and is a better puck handler then Scrivens...
I find it crazy that you say that Scrivens has more upside then a guy that is better overall then him right now, and is 2 years younger...
Some more tweaks in Reimers style (getting him more upright and out at the top of the crease more) and I think we have a real good goalie for years to come...
x.jr.benchwarmer said:I certainly agree that the sample size in Scrivens' play is pretty small, but , to me at least, it seems that his glove is much better, and he has really fast reflexes, and is pretty good on rebound control. And his puck-handling is certainly not good, I agree with you, but I'm not sure that James can be described as the next Brodeur with the puck, from what I've seen at least in his play.