• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Idiocracy

They literally schemed to prevent a significant portion of votes from being delivered in time, and they still lost the election. Seriously, the level of incompetence is quite amusing.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1326179026705281024

Found the fraud.

I'm probably just dumb here but what is the Processing Score Plus 1, Plus 2, etc.

I'm assuming the measured volume is the number of raw ballots that were undelivered?
 
L K said:
I'm probably just dumb here but what is the Processing Score Plus 1, Plus 2, etc.

I'm assuming the measured volume is the number of raw ballots that were undelivered?

Measured volume would be the numbers of ballots that were delivered to election officials on the noted day, which is past the deadline to be counted even if they were postmarked by election day.

As for the processing score, can't say I'm an expert on this but the gist is a processing score measures on-time delivery performance. Plus 1/2/3 is the processing score for 1/2/3 extra days for when the ballot was expected to be delivered. So the lower scores just indicate that those ballots weren't delivered on time.
 
These actions should completely destroy an entire political party. From the ground up, the entire GOP should be decimated by this. That won't happen.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
These actions should completely destroy an entire political party. From the ground up, the entire GOP should be decimated by this. That won't happen.

Unfortunately, the GOP seems to believe destroying democracy is good for them politically.  A ?democratic? US government may only have 4, 8 or 12 years left.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
These actions should completely destroy an entire political party. From the ground up, the entire GOP should be decimated by this. That won't happen.

La la la la we?re  not listening

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020/11/10/trump-federal-budget-post-election/

The White House budget office has instructed federal agencies to continue preparing the Trump administration?s budget proposal for the next fiscal year, according to multiple administration officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of private conversations.
 
At what point does the GOPs actions stop being childish pandering and start to fall under outright rebellion?
 
L K said:
At what point does the GOPs actions stop being childish pandering and start to fall under outright rebellion?

Until the election results are certified and the resulting electors vote, this is unfortunately yet another example of how a great deal of the American system relies on good faith and convention and that Republicans have no interest in maintaining any of that.
 
https://twitter.com/OversightDems/status/1326289149469609985

I'm genuinely unsure why everybody involved with Project Veritas isn't in jail.
 
Nik said:
L K said:
At what point does the GOPs actions stop being childish pandering and start to fall under outright rebellion?

Until the election results are certified and the resulting electors vote, this is unfortunately yet another example of how a great deal of the American system relies on good faith and convention and that Republicans have no interest in maintaining any of that.
It truly is shocking to see how meaningless those norms are if there are no consequences to breaking them. Maybe it's about time that the U.S. recognizes that maybe, just maybe, the framers weren't clairvoyant gods who created an unshakable democracy based on the rule of law vs. the rule of norms.
 
Bender said:
Maybe it's about time that the U.S. recognizes that maybe, just maybe, the framers weren't clairvoyant gods who created an unshakable democracy based on the rule of law vs. the rule of norms.

I get what you're saying but let's be real, nobody really thinks that. The vast majority of Democrats know there's huge problems with the constitution with how it relates to the electoral process and they want to change it. Republicans aren't labouring under the assumption the founders were right about everything, they just see that the inequities are balanced way in their favour and care more about clinging to power than they do democracy or social cohesion and so will never look to change things.
 
Nik said:
Bender said:
Maybe it's about time that the U.S. recognizes that maybe, just maybe, the framers weren't clairvoyant gods who created an unshakable democracy based on the rule of law vs. the rule of norms.

I get what you're saying but let's be real, nobody really thinks that. The vast majority of Democrats know there's huge problems with the constitution with how it relates to the electoral process and they want to change it. Republicans aren't labouring under the assumption the founders were right about everything, they just see that the inequities are balanced way in their favour and care more about clinging to power than they do democracy or social cohesion and so will never look to change things.

To wit...the notion of proportional representation in Canada always seems to be a promised priority when trying to overcome whichever party is in power but suddenly seems to fade away again as soon as that happens.

It's really not surprising. Those in power rapidly lose interest in making it easier for others to usurp them, as evidenced by ~10,000 years of history (and counting)
 
CarltonTheBear said:
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1326345253360635904

Right. The whole thing is completely made up. Trump was making it up months prior to the election even happening.

Yet a recent poll shows 70% of republicans now believe the election was corrupted.

There is always a lot of ?both sides .... blah, blah, blah?.  No. The Republican Party alone is bent on destroyzing American democracy. The situation is not symmetric.
 
Nik said:
Bender said:
Maybe it's about time that the U.S. recognizes that maybe, just maybe, the framers weren't clairvoyant gods who created an unshakable democracy based on the rule of law vs. the rule of norms.

I get what you're saying but let's be real, nobody really thinks that. The vast majority of Democrats know there's huge problems with the constitution with how it relates to the electoral process and they want to change it. Republicans aren't labouring under the assumption the founders were right about everything, they just see that the inequities are balanced way in their favour and care more about clinging to power than they do democracy or social cohesion and so will never look to change things.
Right, in another sense I also mean The Constitution is used as a basis for legal rulings the framers never would've thought of. I find it comical that something like health care can be approved or struck down based on whether it's constitutional or not depending on ones interpretation of the Constitution. How could something like health care be both potentially constitutional and unconstitutional at the same time? Schrodinger's health plan...
 
CarltonTheBear said:
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1326345253360635904

I didn't read the full transcript. But, I'm assuming the next question was: "Court: then what the hell are you doing in my courtroom?"
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top