Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sickbeast said:I will say that to me this move does not seem baseball related at all. It was personal. If I had to guess I would say that Tulo was a voice of dissent within the clubhouse against the current management. I do believe Shapiro in particular shipped Tulo out of town for this reason.
So then why exactly do you feel that they shouldn't have allowed Tulo to attend spring training and build up some trade value? I understand the move in the sense that it gives the younger players playing time. But what I don't understand is paying him $30 million to do nothing when another team might have been willing to eat at least some salary had he proven to be a healthy and effective player.Andy said:sickbeast said:I will say that to me this move does not seem baseball related at all. It was personal. If I had to guess I would say that Tulo was a voice of dissent within the clubhouse against the current management. I do believe Shapiro in particular shipped Tulo out of town for this reason.
Yep, or, as seems to be the case, the exact opposite of this.
sickbeast said:So then why exactly do you feel that they shouldn't have allowed Tulo to attend spring training and build up some trade value? I understand the move in the sense that it gives the younger players playing time. But what I don't understand is paying him $30 million to do nothing when another team might have been willing to eat at least some salary had he proven to be a healthy and effective player.
You don't know that. And we never will because of this bone headed management.bustaheims said:sickbeast said:So then why exactly do you feel that they shouldn't have allowed Tulo to attend spring training and build up some trade value? I understand the move in the sense that it gives the younger players playing time. But what I don't understand is paying him $30 million to do nothing when another team might have been willing to eat at least some salary had he proven to be a healthy and effective player.
By the time he might have been able to build up enough value for another team to take on any meaningful amount of his salary, the Jays would have already had paid most of this season's salary, and he would have taken playing time away from the young guys the team wants to develop at the big league level. He hasn't played in a season and a half. It would have taken months for other teams to believe he's healthy enough to be a contributor - and that's not even considering the fact that, in his last two relatively healthy seasons, he was basically a roughly league average bat. If there are any issues with his ability to play a defensive position - there would be significant concerns, regardless of whether or not he is healthy enough to take the field in spring training. Even if he did generate some interest in spring training, the Jays would have been on the hook for basically his entire salary in any deal worth making, and, odds are against that deal materializing. Realistically, it's eat the contract now, and give Tulo a chance to catch on somewhere else, or eat the contract in the spring, and put Tulo in a much more difficult situation when it comes to finding a job.
At best, right now, his value is zero, and it's going to take a long time to build it up to anything substantially more than zero. That's time the team shouldn't be wasting on him, as the return isn't going to be anything worthwhile.
bustaheims said:sickbeast said:So then why exactly do you feel that they shouldn't have allowed Tulo to attend spring training and build up some trade value? I understand the move in the sense that it gives the younger players playing time. But what I don't understand is paying him $30 million to do nothing when another team might have been willing to eat at least some salary had he proven to be a healthy and effective player.
By the time he might have been able to build up enough value for another team to take on any meaningful amount of his salary, the Jays would have already had paid most of this season's salary, and he would have taken playing time away from the young guys the team wants to develop at the big league level. He hasn't played in a season and a half. It would have taken months for other teams to believe he's healthy enough to be a contributor - and that's not even considering the fact that, in his last two relatively healthy seasons, he was basically a roughly league average bat. If there are any issues with his ability to play a defensive position - there would be significant concerns, regardless of whether or not he is healthy enough to take the field in spring training. Even if he did generate some interest in spring training, the Jays would have been on the hook for basically his entire salary in any deal worth making, and, odds are against that deal materializing. Realistically, it's eat the contract now, and give Tulo a chance to catch on somewhere else, or eat the contract in the spring, and put Tulo in a much more difficult situation when it comes to finding a job.
At best, right now, his value is zero, and it's going to take a long time to build it up to anything substantially more than zero. That's time the team shouldn't be wasting on him, as the return isn't going to be anything worthwhile.
Deebo said:If I was the GM of another team, it would take half a season at the very least of strong play before I would even consider giving up anything of even remote value or take on significant money to get Tulo.
As the Jays, I'd rather give those PAs to Gurriel then hold out hope that they may be able to get a long shot prospect or save a few dollars.
L K said:Tulo's value wouldn't be boosted by a good spring training. His injury issues and reputation as being a soft player are what will hold him back, on top of being extremely expensive. His bat fell off quite a bit before his trade to Toronto. He had a few really important hits for the organization but overall was just not a great acquisition. We wouldn't have received much of value for him in a trade even if we convinced someone to take him on and the benefit of Gurriel getting playing time or giving Travis an opportunity to perform up until his eventual replacement when Guerrero/Bichette/Biggio push into the Majors is more valuable in terms of building a trade asset.
This is a good move by the organization.
Dappleganger said:In 87 games before the trade to Toronto, Tulo was batting .300, was on pace for 22 home runs and 99 rbi and had a .818 OPS. The year previous he had an OPS over 1.000. Not sure where that narrative comes from.
Nik the Trik said:Dappleganger said:In 87 games before the trade to Toronto, Tulo was batting .300, was on pace for 22 home runs and 99 rbi and had a .818 OPS. The year previous he had an OPS over 1.000. Not sure where that narrative comes from.
A lot of what you're seeing is just the illusion of playing in Coors Field. In his road stats in 2014 he slashed .257/.364/.447 and then in 2015 he drops to .276/.327/.409.
His Road OPS goes:
2013: .850
2014: .811
2015: .736
His .761 OPS in 2016 was actually a bit of a bounceback.
Dappleganger said:I get the Coors field bump, but his entire career was played at Coors Field and doesn't bear out a decline. His home OPS increased from 1.010 in 2013 to 1.246 in 2014.
Nik the Trik said:Dappleganger said:I get the Coors field bump, but his entire career was played at Coors Field and doesn't bear out a decline. His home OPS increased from 1.010 in 2013 to 1.246 in 2014.
Right, but that's why road statistics are typically used as the context-neutral baseline. During his peak years(2009-2011), Tulowitzki had Road OPS's of .859, .863 and even .881. In 2013 it was fairly consistent with that and by 2015 it had fallen more than 100 points. So the evidence that he had already begun to slip from his peak is actually pretty strong even if Coors was covering that up a little.
One of the tricky things with Tulowitzki, because he was injured so often, is separating what of his decline is injury related, what is age related and what is just the standard variations in a baseball career. In this case though, when you compare him to his peak, it's pretty clear he was already moving away from his best years.
Dappleganger said:When the Jays traded for Tulo his road OPS hadn't fallen by more than 100 points.
Nik the Trik said:Dappleganger said:When the Jays traded for Tulo his road OPS hadn't fallen by more than 100 points.
Right, I didn't say it had. From where he was consistently at his peak it had fallen by around 50 points by the time of the trade which is still a pretty meaningful decline. From 2013 to 2015 it's a fairly unmistakable downward slide in his ability to hit in any ballpark other than Coors.
Dappleganger said:Sorry, got confused. I thought we were talking about before the Jays traded for him.