Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zee said:I liked how he said the Leafs goals against is not championship quality, you mean like the eventual champions Washington who allowed more regular season goals than the Leafs? [emoji848]Nik the Trik said:Seriously though, arguments about signing Tavares aside:
Tavares, while great, is not what the Leafs needed. All the money spent on him will not stop the team?s goals-against average.
and
The high-octane Leafs that were headed toward a championship took the wrong fork in the tracks.
This is embarrassingly bad writing.
L K said:Zee said:I liked how he said the Leafs goals against is not championship quality, you mean like the eventual champions Washington who allowed more regular season goals than the Leafs? [emoji848]Nik the Trik said:Seriously though, arguments about signing Tavares aside:
Tavares, while great, is not what the Leafs needed. All the money spent on him will not stop the team?s goals-against average.
and
The high-octane Leafs that were headed toward a championship took the wrong fork in the tracks.
This is embarrassingly bad writing.
This year - 46 goals against in 17GP = 2.71 GAA (currently 7th best in the league)
Last year - 232 goals against in 82GP = 2.80 GAA (12th in the league last year)
So technically the Leafs have improved their GAA with the addition of Tavares.
It's also funny because the Leafs gave up 2.80 goals/game last year. The Cup winners gave up 2.90 goals/game. The Winnipeg Jets gave up 2.63 goals/game (14 goals over 82 games). The Eastern Conference Finalists gave up 2.85 goals/game and the Western Conference Finalists gave up 2.74 goals/game.
So the average GAA for the four Conference Finalists was 2.78 goals/game. That averages out to about a 1.6 goals more per season given up be the Leafs than the average of the four "best" teams in hockey last year.
herman said:https://twitter.com/ATFulemin/status/1062119400470388736
Bender said:If that were an option why wouldn't they have done that?
herman said:The Leafs would've been all for it. The players had plenty of reason to believe year 3 of their ELCs would be nuts. The only way teams get their young stars a year before their ELC expiry is presenting an immediate overpay.
Nik the Trik said:herman said:The Leafs would've been all for it. The players had plenty of reason to believe year 3 of their ELCs would be nuts. The only way teams get their young stars a year before their ELC expiry is presenting an immediate overpay.
I don't think that's necessarily true. Unless by "overpay" you mean more or less what the player would have gotten without all the hassle. McDavid is the fairly obvious example of the guy who got his 2nd deal, at a relatively fair rate, as soon as he could. Admittedly, McDavid isn't a typical player even among exceptional players but I'm guessing with 15 minutes and some detective work we could find a host of guys who it's equally true of.
herman said:I was thinking of guys like Ekblad, Eichel, and Ehlers.
Nik the Trik said:I don't know that I think of Ehlers as a huge overpayment but sure. On the flipside though you have guys like Hall, Seguin and Tavares who signed their 2nd deals with a year left on their ELCs and who signed pretty reasonable 2nd deals.
herman said:No, Ehlers is not technically an overpay, but he definitely could have been squeezed down lower as an RFA without arbitration.
herman said:Tavares is in the same boat as McDavid: poorly managed team, first overall saviour who grew up always carrying team responsibility because he could...
Nik the Trik said:Some teams may value their relationships with their players more than squeezing every nickel they can out of them.
herman said:If there wasn't a Marner deal looming, Nylander's would already be done. Marner's is going to be fire and brimstone compared to this cold brew.
Nik the Trik said:The Jets would have signed Ehlers knowing they also had to negotiate long term deals with Trouba and Laine but sure.
My point, my dear and treasured Herman, is just that players are different. Some guys want to fight it out tooth and nail, others don't. I think that's why some guys get reasonable deals ASAP, others get reasonable deals at the wire and everything in between.
herman said:No disagreement about that here. Just saying if you want to get a deal at the end of ELC year 2, 'overpay' + term is how you'd get it done. What constitutes an overpay is down to the individual player's self valuation. If we offered 7.2M AAV over 8 years to Nylander the summer 2017 instead of signing Marleau or Zaitsev's extension, is he not just ripping up the league right now?
Nik the Trik said:herman said:No disagreement about that here. Just saying if you want to get a deal at the end of ELC year 2, 'overpay' + term is how you'd get it done. What constitutes an overpay is down to the individual player's self valuation. If we offered 7.2M AAV over 8 years to Nylander the summer 2017 instead of signing Marleau or Zaitsev's extension, is he not just ripping up the league right now?
Well, again, I don't agree re: "overpay" so much as it is not scrapping for nickels but I think it's just as much about the faith a team has in a player. If Winnipeg thinks that in a few years the idea of Ehlers being "overpaid" at 6 million will be a joke, then why care about maybe getting him for 5.75 if you avoid the troubles?
Teams looking to sign players before they play out their ELCs are making bets that the "overpay" will still be on better terms than they could get if they let a player play that third year and put up big numbers. They are also making a decision re: savings vs. strife.