dekedastardly
Member
I miss Matt Martin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Peter D. said:Bullfrog said:What a strange rule. Why does it matter if his skate is on the ice or not? Shouldn't the blue line be considered a vertical plane?
Agreed. Should be like football. The fact they spend minutes to determine if a guy's blade is millimetres off the ice is ridiculous. If the skate is on the plane, it should be onside. If both skates are on the other side of the plane, offside.
hockeyfan1 said:Sean Avery weighs in on the Tavares treatment by Islanders fans...
[tweet]1101539322954686470[/tweet]
Zee said:hockeyfan1 said:Sean Avery weighs in on the Tavares treatment by Islanders fans...
[tweet]1101539322954686470[/tweet]
The latest Spittin Chicklets podcast just out today has an Islanders fan vs. Sean Avery on the phone, it's pretty funny.
Gender Bender said:Zee said:hockeyfan1 said:Sean Avery weighs in on the Tavares treatment by Islanders fans...
[tweet]1101539322954686470[/tweet]
The latest Spittin Chicklets podcast just out today has an Islanders fan vs. Sean Avery on the phone, it's pretty funny.
I really dislike that podcast in general for being really trashy most of the time but I'll try to give it a listen.
Bullfrog said:The plane doesn't change, but your reference would. But the point is if the call is that close, then it's a stupid rule.
I assume the rule states players skate must be on the ice because clearly, he has not broken the plain. He is not over the line. He's not "offside".OldTimeHockey said:Bullfrog said:The plane doesn't change, but your reference would. But the point is if the call is that close, then it's a stupid rule.
That's what I meant. If the view is towards the neutral zone side of the blueline, the player will always appear closer to being offside. If it's towards the O'zone then the player will appear to be closer to being onside.
I personally think offsides has a place in the game. I would hate to see a game that is just stretch passes. But, I also didn't like the idea of removing the two line pass....so I'm sure I'd get over offsides being removed.
Can we go with a basketball style set up with a half court line? Do we start calling Over and back?
cabber24 said:I assume the rule states players skate must be on the ice because clearly, he has not broken the plain. He is not over the line. He's not "offside".OldTimeHockey said:Bullfrog said:The plane doesn't change, but your reference would. But the point is if the call is that close, then it's a stupid rule.
That's what I meant. If the view is towards the neutral zone side of the blueline, the player will always appear closer to being offside. If it's towards the O'zone then the player will appear to be closer to being onside.
I personally think offsides has a place in the game. I would hate to see a game that is just stretch passes. But, I also didn't like the idea of removing the two line pass....so I'm sure I'd get over offsides being removed.
Can we go with a basketball style set up with a half court line? Do we start calling Over and back?