• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Marleau traded to Carolina

Significantly Insignificant said:
Does this trade also increase the value of Zaitsev, Kadri and Brown?  They no longer have to trade any of them because of salary reasons.  Zaitsev wants out, sure, but they don't need to give him away. 

If the answer to the first question is yes, then it could be that they can recoup some of the cost of the first by being able to charge more for the other three.

If I'm at all interested in Zaitsev in any meaningful way then this probably doesn't change much. Either I was bidding against someone in a real hope to get him or I was cool on him and lowballing the Leafs.
 
Oh well, goodbye Patrick Marleau.  As a Leafs fan, I appreciate your time here.

I approve of the trade even though losing a first rounder is never good.  Dubas did what he had to do, and the Leafs right now are in a much better (cap) position.
 
Auston says it best:

[tweet]1142504179283505152[/tweet]

https://www.instagram.com/p/BzBcbTGAtdY/?igshid=bn3q1r5twxz2
 
herman said:
https://twitter.com/c_marleau/status/1142472192254328838

*sobs

What a classy dude. His example to Auston and Mitch for two years was valuable for their young careers. Also, that's why you treat people right. It can lead to a great testimonial from a respected person. People take notice that your organization is run well.  Toronto has definitely changed it's rep. Full credit to Shanny, Babs, Kyle and Lou for that.

Good luck Patty!
 
https://twitter.com/Marner93/status/1142585268995858433
https://twitter.com/kasperikapanen1/status/1142491160381919232
 
This is one of the two moves needed to get the Leafs half way the Leafs roster in shape for the start of the season. The projected cap space of $13.5 million plus Horton's LTR of $5.3 million gives the Leafs $18.8 million to work with to sign the pending RFA forwards,  Marner ($10-$10.5) and Kappy and Johnny about $3-4 mil each. That would give the Leafs 12 forwards, 5 d (if you consider Holl part of the equation?, not me, Holl is replaced by Rosen) and Freddy locked up.
That still leaves a back-up goalie needed (assuming Sparks is gone), and some defence and bottom line holes to fill. Moving Zaitsev might be part of that solution. Personally, I'd sooner see them keep Kadri and Brown and move Nylander, a bigger salary dump and would probably command a solid top 4 right handed d-man. To me that makes the most sense. That still leaves, Marner, Kapanen and Brown on the right side, with Bracco knocking on the door. I think the Leafs need to add some grit not subtract (Kadri, Brown).
 
Dangle makes a good point. Cap space is a big asset in this era. There were only a handful of teams that could take the whole $6.25-million and Carolina was one of them. For a team currently in their window to have that completely disappear is huge. Hence the pick in the high twenties.
 
Bender said:
Frycer14 said:
Bender said:
Lots of people were looking at Tavares two years out. Sure it's unlikely, but it's a scenario you have to plan for.

Nah, I think that's pushing it. Put it this way, if someone told us two years back that Nylander, Marner, and Matthews would all pan out as well as they have, and we'd sign Tavares, and all it would cost us is a late 1st round pick (which I think a lot of people are tremendously overvaluing), then we'd all be high fiving and doing kegstands.
Everyone knew the third year was an issue at the time and the cap hit was high for someone who was likely to hit a wall. You don't need to get Tavares in order to plan intelligently. I you're planning on spending to the cap and you project a 6.25m 40y.o. to be replacement level that cap hit will be an issue if it's Tavares or whomever the FAs signed are if we are a team spending to the cap consistently.

Whose to say they didn't have something of this nature in mind from the get go? Perhaps, the Leafs and Marleau's camp discussed such a scenario two years ago. We really don't know...
 
Sorry I?m many ways to see him go, but one of those things that had to happen. I?m glad to have seen a player of his class represent the Leafs
 
herman said:
It?s been a few days now, so this isn?t a hot take: I feel like we got off really easy here.
When you think that the alternative is Bracco or a roster player..... Yeah, no. Id rather the team give up the first and try to hit home runs with the rest of their picks. Iirc a 1st that late is basically valued as a 2nd and isn't all that valuable.
 
Bender said:
herman said:
It?s been a few days now, so this isn?t a hot take: I feel like we got off really easy here.
When you think that the alternative is Bracco or a roster player..... Yeah, no. Id rather the team give up the first and try to hit home runs with the rest of their picks. Iirc a 1st that late is basically valued as a 2nd and isn't all that valuable.

I'd rather have given up Bracco, but I doubt that was on the table.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Bender said:
herman said:
It?s been a few days now, so this isn?t a hot take: I feel like we got off really easy here.
When you think that the alternative is Bracco or a roster player..... Yeah, no. Id rather the team give up the first and try to hit home runs with the rest of their picks. Iirc a 1st that late is basically valued as a 2nd and isn't all that valuable.

I'd rather have given up Bracco, but I doubt that was on the table.
Curious as to why? No space for him on the roster?
 
Bender said:
When you think that the alternative is Bracco or a roster player..... Yeah, no. Id rather the team give up the first and try to hit home runs with the rest of their picks. Iirc a 1st that late is basically valued as a 2nd and isn't all that valuable.

In fairness, we don't know how late a pick it'll be and Dubas including the top 10 protection is smart. The team is still thin enough that an injury to Freddy or even just a run of bad luck could easily have the pick be anywhere from 10-20.

I'm happy the Leafs were able to do it but like everything else it feels like they paid a relatively high price. Especially considering Marleau, while not great or anything, wasn't some sort of embarrassing train wreck on the ice.
 
Bender said:
Curious as to why? No space for him on the roster?

My very casual opinion on him is that I don't really see him being much better than someone like Tyler Ennis was last season. So somewhat valuable but still not difficult to replace if you look hard enough.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I'd rather have given up Bracco, but I doubt that was on the table.

Yeah. If the option was Bracco or a 1st, I think I give up Bracco. However, the reports are that it was Kapanen/Johnsson or a 1st, and, in that case, it's an easy choice. Based on where the team expects to be drafting, you're hoping to get a guy as good as either of them, and not likely a full-time NHL player for a couple years after being drafts.
 
bustaheims said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I'd rather have given up Bracco, but I doubt that was on the table.

Yeah. If the option was Bracco or a 1st, I think I give up Bracco. However, the reports are that it was Kapanen/Johnsson or a 1st, and, in that case, it's an easy choice. Based on where the team expects to be drafting, you're hoping to get a guy as good as either of them, and not likely a full-time NHL player for a couple years after being drafts.

I don't know, I think he showed a lot this last year with the Marlies. I would think he has to project to be better than a 29y.o. Tyler Ennis. Do you really get a player better than Bracco that late? (Although Sandin would be a good example......)
 
Bender said:
I don't know, I think he showed a lot this last year with the Marlies. I would think he has to project to be better than a 29y.o. Tyler Ennis. Do you really get a player better than Bracco that late? (Although Sandin would be a good example......)

I'm just worried too much of Bracco's success with the Marlies this past season was on the powerplay. 39 of his 79 points were on the PP (49%). Just for comparisons sake, Johnsson's last season with the Marlies 18 of his 54 points were on the PP (33%). At 5-on-5 his scoring numbers are only slightly ahead of guys like Marchment, Engvall, Brooks. And IIRC his 5-on-5 possession numbers (as tracked by Jeff Veillette at least) weren't particularly flattering. So I'm not super confident about how much value he can add at even-strength, and I'm sceptical about whether his powerplay abilities will translate against NHL coaches and PKers.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top