cw said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
So Burke's genius idea is to go with Scrivens as the backup? Because he was just as "Gus" as Gus last night.
Maybe. Maybe not.
If Reimer came back healthy soon and was playing well, I'd play him 9 of every 10 games if I was intent on making the playoffs. And I might send Scrivens down to get a bunch of games in the AHL while Gus rides the pine and might even be piggish enough to bring Scrivens up 1 out of every 10 games if he shows more over the next few games.
I'd like to see how Ben does for the next few games - to see if there's any improvement. No matter what, he's starting to look like he has more of a future than Gus right now and he needs to play.
Neither of them have proven or disproven anything because they haven't played enough games. My position is that we should give them each a good stretch of starts to get a real fix on who should be the backup.
How people can write off Gustavsson at this point is beyond me. Well, actually it isn't: people are "guaranteeing" the Gus would have collapsed, that he drags the team's confidence down, that he has a bad attitude ... or, as Wilson seems to believe, that he's not resilient. In short, people are indulging in the admittedly very pleasant idle pastime of pop psychology.
I point out again that both of them are running at .500 w/l, so their actual impact on the team's fortunes is the same so far. All the other chatter is just that, chatter.
By all means give Scrivens the next few games. BUT, then give Gustavsson an equal amount. Do a comparison after that and make your decision.