Kin
New member
RedLeaf said:That's my point. The odds have diminished to the point where management would have to seriously question whether or not tanking is a viable enough approach. I mean, a team could purposely tank for 5 straight years, finish dead last and still end up with mediocre results. At what point do you say it isn't worth it? The sure thing was last year. This year, not so much.
All anyone can do in any situation is maximize their chances at success. Tanking represents that short of an alternative that's more likely to yield results. If the team doesn't tank what represents the better option? Drafting 8th every year? Do what they did under Burke and desperately try for the bottom playoff seed with no appreciable road to becoming a contender?
Nothing is a sure thing. Even last year. We saw it with the Coyotes. They tanked as hard as they could and didn't land Eichel or McDavid. Whether you're aiming for the bottom or the top you don't get to control the situation around you.
The people running this team have a responsibility to treat it like a serious enterprise. They're not girls planning their sweet 16 birthday party. They're not going to pout and whine because things aren't exactly as they want them to be. Good players will be available even at #4 and they can afford to be patient until they find mix.