lc9 said:Bender said:lamajama said:drummond said:Marlies have second best GAA in the AHL. Sure, their goalies play great (Owuya, Scrivens as well as Rynaas) but obviously it is not just the goalies but the whole defensive system. If it works with Marlies why the hell not with the Leafs. It is there, just apply the system with the Leafs.
But don't you know? The Leafs have to run and gun to entertain the fans that come to the games. If not, they won't buy tickets. Burke has said many times that "we're in the entertainment business". Maybe so but they're certainly not in the winning business.
For those with their sarcasm meter broken, I'm not advocating TB 1-3-1
or New Jersey under Lemaire but I am advocating some kind
of defensive system.
Right now our defensive system consists of following the refs to centre ice
after another goal.
You`re honestly advocating that the team plays a style for the purposes of entertaining and not winning.... wow.
Wasn't that sarcasm?
It was.
But on a non sarcastic note: this team was built to run and gun. When the goalies let in some softies, Wilson's reaction seemed to be to get them to play a more defensive style. So they tried, got burned for a couple of goals and then had to move back to run & gun to try to get back into it when their opponent, up by a couple, could sit back and wait for the inevitable, higher risk turnovers.
In other words, I question Wilson's coaching under those circumstances. This team plays best when it does what it's designed to do best: run & gun. Wilson complained about the hole they got themselves into but to some extent, some of that hole was brought about by them trying to play a defensive game they're simply not designed to be as good at. To some extent, I think Wilson bears some responsibility for that though I concede under the circumstances of goalies giving up soft goals, it might have been something that was tempting to try.