mr grieves said:
So, a trade rocketing the team up from having a 1C ranked ~40th in the league to one in the top 10 is worth a trade involving either Gardiner or Rielly, but one sending them up merely into the top 15 isn't?
Well, it seems like you're pretty proud of yourself for catching me in what you seem to think is a bit of a contradiction but really it's all down to the problem of you thinking my point of view doesn't add up because I'm not starting from a position of agreeing with your every assessment of every player. So Duchene is a top 15 center in the league? Based on....points? Well, leaving aside the problem that judging a player solely on that basis is problematic you're left with the more pressing contradiction that the Leafs already
have a center who finished in the top 15 in scoring. So if the argument is that Duchene's scoring output makes him a player who fills a hole the Leafs need filled, you're left trying to explain why Kadri doesn't already fill it.
Again, in the question of "Who will be the Leafs #1 center going forward" the question is emphatically
not just whoever you might want to bring in vs. Tyler Bozak.
mr grieves said:
There's still a lot of room for improvement if you're making do with Tyler Bozak -- or Derek Roy, or Kyle Wellwood, or Frans Nielsen, or Dominic Moore, or Steve Ott, or any other centers Bozak finds himself among in the points race.
Oh good. I was looking forward to another episode of Biased Comparison Theatre.
Regardless, nobody is arguing that there isn't room for improvement on Bozak. Just whether or not Duchene would provide enough of an upgrade to make it worth the cost.
mr grieves said:
Duchene doesn't have the offensive potential to be an upgrade -- he is an upgrade. Is he enough of an upgrade that he's worth parting with your best assets for? In terms of production and track record, maybe no. But since he's still got another RFA contract, he's cost controlled relative to the 1Cs you'd find on the UFA market. There's something in there that's usually worth spending assets on.
Unless, again, the Leafs view of the situation is that when it comes to the bigger picture of "Who will be our #1 center going forward" it isn't about Duchene and his potential vs. Bozak and his but rather Duchene and his potential vs. Bozak, Kadri, Bolland and Colborne and theirs. If the Leafs see Kadri as that guy, which seems pretty likely based on his year last year, then the question is really about whether or not Duchene is enough of an improvement on
Kadri in terms of potential in the #1C job or, failing that, the rest of them in the #2C job and whether that outweighs what Gardiner or Rielly could provide in terms of being the sort of elite puck moving defenseman the Leafs desperately need.
But even moving past that, princedpw is right that talking about this trade in the abstract is largely meaningless. You'll notice that when I talk about this as a potential trade I talk about the leafs spending assets
like Gardiner
and Rielly whereas you, arguing about just how great a trade this would be, talk about a trade involving
one of Gariner
or Rielly. I don't know what it would take to trade for Duchene if he is indeed available but I'd guess that, sort of like the return I'd want for Kadri, Roy wouldn't be satisfied with trading a good young NHL player for another team's prospect and a questionable draft pick(Bozak+Liles+a first as you suggest below does not strike me as being anywhere near the ballpark) so it's probably important to remember that, going forward, opinion on trading for Duchene is going to be split based not only on people's opinions of Duchene or Bozak or Kadri but also on whether or not they think that Colorado is going to trade him for the hot dog parts you seem to think they will.