• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2019-2020 Toronto Maple Leafs Summer Edition

CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
If healthy, the King is guaranteed 40+ games with a defense that is slightly better than NYRs.

Toronto's defence was much better than NYRs even just this past season without Pietro.

I didn't want to oversell it but we're losing Ceci, so...
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Guilt Trip said:
Um big fat no. The King is dead..lol. Who would take on Flower at 3.5 for 2 years?

You'd consider Fleury but not Lundqvist? They had the same save percentage despite one playing on the worst defensive team in the league and one playing on one of the best.
No I was offering up a comparable on an aging goalie who's best days are far behind them. I dont want either. I want a Kuemper for Freddie deal.
 
Guilt Trip said:
No I was offering up a comparable on an aging goalie who's best days are far behind them. I dont want either. I want a Kuemper for Freddie deal.

Fair. I'd definitely be interested in Kuemper but don't really want to give up the 15th overall pick. But if we can trade Andersen for a 1st to a team that will benefit a lot from his $1mil salary then I'd be fine flipping that pick to Arizona for him. If we did that, signed Brodie to a $5mil deal, signed Mikheyev and Rodrigues to $1.5mil deals and traded Johnsson and Dermott away you'd have a roster that looks like:

Hyman-Matthews-Nylander
Mikheyev-Tavares-Marner
Robertson-Kerfoot-Barabanov
Engvall-Rodrigues-Spezza
$900k 13th forward

Rielly-Brodie
Muzzin-Holl
Sandin-Liljegren
Lehtonen

Kuemper
Campbell

That's just a smidge under the cap. If you wanted to clear a bit of space you could replace Engvall and Rodrigues with guys closer to league minimum. That would either give you room to bring Dermott back (albeit in a strictly bottom pair role) or sign a veteran like Thornton or Simmonds to give the bottom-6 a new look.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Guilt Trip said:
No I was offering up a comparable on an aging goalie who's best days are far behind them. I dont want either. I want a Kuemper for Freddie deal.

Fair. I'd definitely be interested in Kuemper but don't really want to give up the 15th overall pick. But if we can trade Andersen for a 1st to a team that will benefit a lot from his $1mil salary then I'd be fine flipping that pick to Arizona for him.
Why would we have to give up the 1st to get Kuemper? All I've heard is Arizona wants to dump salary so trade them one for one. Arizona gets almost as good a goalie for a million dollars. They'll save, in actual cash, 2.5 mill this year and 5.5 next season. That's an 8 million dollar savings. Yes they'll have to get another goalie for next season but even at say 3 mill, they're still ahead 5 mill. Leafs will save 500k in Cap and have a goalie for 2 years.
Am I way off here?
 
Guilt Trip said:
Why would we have to give up the 1st to get Kuemper? All I've heard is Arizona wants to dump salary so trade them one for one. Arizona gets almost as good a goalie for a million dollars. They'll save, in actual cash, 2.5 mill this year and 5.5 next season. That's an 8 million dollar savings. Yes they'll have to get another goalie for next season but even at say 3 mill, they're still ahead 5 mill. Leafs will save 500k in Cap and have a goalie for 2 years.
Am I way off here?

I'm not sure Arizona goes for a 1-for-1 swap because Kuemper has an extra year on his contract, but if Andersen is involved, a 1st round pick shouldn't be.

That's a big if, though. Arizona doesn't have a ton of cap space, and I'm not sure they'd want $9.25M of it tied up with their goalies.
 
bustaheims said:
Guilt Trip said:
Why would we have to give up the 1st to get Kuemper? All I've heard is Arizona wants to dump salary so trade them one for one. Arizona gets almost as good a goalie for a million dollars. They'll save, in actual cash, 2.5 mill this year and 5.5 next season. That's an 8 million dollar savings. Yes they'll have to get another goalie for next season but even at say 3 mill, they're still ahead 5 mill. Leafs will save 500k in Cap and have a goalie for 2 years.
Am I way off here?

I'm not sure Arizona goes for a 1-for-1 swap because Kuemper has an extra year on his contract, but if Andersen is involved, a 1st round pick shouldn't be.

That's a big if, though. Arizona doesn't have a ton of cap space, and I'm not sure they'd want $9.25M of it tied up with their goalies.
Good point but it's only a 500k increase in Cap and 5 times that in actual cash savings. They are apparently shopping everyone so we'll see but I think they can do it.
 
Guilt Trip said:
Why would we have to give up the 1st to get Kuemper? All I've heard is Arizona wants to dump salary so trade them one for one. Arizona gets almost as good a goalie for a million dollars. They'll save, in actual cash, 2.5 mill this year and 5.5 next season. That's an 8 million dollar savings. Yes they'll have to get another goalie for next season but even at say 3 mill, they're still ahead 5 mill. Leafs will save 500k in Cap and have a goalie for 2 years.
Am I way off here?

They need to replenish their draft picks and are probably fine with using Raanta/Hill as their goalies next year. I can't see them having much interest in one year of Andersen especially if they're looking to cut even more cash beyond Kuemper like Stepan. That'd be a signal they don't have much hope for next season so getting futures back just makes more sense.

If 2 years of Kuemper goes for anything less than a 1st I'd be pretty shocked.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Guilt Trip said:
No I was offering up a comparable on an aging goalie who's best days are far behind them. I dont want either. I want a Kuemper for Freddie deal.

Fair. I'd definitely be interested in Kuemper but don't really want to give up the 15th overall pick. But if we can trade Andersen for a 1st to a team that will benefit a lot from his $1mil salary then I'd be fine flipping that pick to Arizona for him. If we did that, signed Brodie to a $5mil deal, signed Mikheyev and Rodrigues to $1.5mil deals and traded Johnsson and Dermott away you'd have a roster that looks like:

Hyman-Matthews-Nylander
Mikheyev-Tavares-Marner
Robertson-Kerfoot-Barabanov
Engvall-Rodrigues-Spezza
$900k 13th forward

Rielly-Brodie
Muzzin-Holl
Sandin-Liljegren
Lehtonen

Kuemper
Campbell

That's just a smidge under the cap. If you wanted to clear a bit of space you could replace Engvall and Rodrigues with guys closer to league minimum. That would either give you room to bring Dermott back (albeit in a strictly bottom pair role) or sign a veteran like Thornton or Simmonds to give the bottom-6 a new look.

Do we really think we get a 1st for Andersen?  Robin Lehner got traded for a low 2nd, a mediocre backup in Malcolm Subban and a 4th round prospect (plus the 5th round pick they gave the Leafs for eating salary/Dzierkals)
 
L K said:
Do we really think we get a 1st for Andersen?  Robin Lehner got traded for a low 2nd, a mediocre backup in Malcolm Subban and a 4th round prospect (plus the 5th round pick they gave the Leafs for eating salary/Dzierkals)

Lehner was a pending UFA who had a big salary that some teams might not have been able to fit in even at the deadline (like you said, they even needed to get the Leafs involved to eat salary so he could fit in with Vegas). That was also at a point where most teams aren't exactly looking to change starting goalies so the demand was lower than it would be now.

Andersen still has a full year left on his contract. Now if his salary matched his AAV it might be tough to get a 1st rounder out of him. But with a $1mil salary I think a number of teams with owners who just lost a crap ton of money will be interested in him.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
They need to replenish their draft picks and are probably fine with using Raanta/Hill as their goalies next year. I can't see them having much interest in one year of Andersen especially if they're looking to cut even more cash beyond Kuemper like Stepan. That'd be a signal they don't have much hope for next season so getting futures back just makes more sense.

If 2 years of Kuemper goes for anything less than a 1st I'd be pretty shocked.

I think the only way it works is the exceptionally rare 3 team deal. So, you know, not happening and all.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Guilt Trip said:
Why would we have to give up the 1st to get Kuemper? All I've heard is Arizona wants to dump salary so trade them one for one. Arizona gets almost as good a goalie for a million dollars. They'll save, in actual cash, 2.5 mill this year and 5.5 next season. That's an 8 million dollar savings. Yes they'll have to get another goalie for next season but even at say 3 mill, they're still ahead 5 mill. Leafs will save 500k in Cap and have a goalie for 2 years.
Am I way off here?

They need to replenish their draft picks and are probably fine with using Raanta/Hill as their goalies next year. I can't see them having much interest in one year of Andersen especially if they're looking to cut even more cash beyond Kuemper like Stepan. That'd be a signal they don't have much hope for next season so getting futures back just makes more sense.

If 2 years of Kuemper goes for anything less than a 1st I'd be pretty shocked.
Makes sense. I was just looking at it from a cash savings and didn't consider their loss of picks.
 
bustaheims said:
CarltonTheBear said:
They need to replenish their draft picks and are probably fine with using Raanta/Hill as their goalies next year. I can't see them having much interest in one year of Andersen especially if they're looking to cut even more cash beyond Kuemper like Stepan. That'd be a signal they don't have much hope for next season so getting futures back just makes more sense.

If 2 years of Kuemper goes for anything less than a 1st I'd be pretty shocked.

I think the only way it works is the exceptionally rare 3 team deal. So, you know, not happening and all.
That could happen. Leafs actually had Lehner at the deadline last year lol. Let's say it's possible. What team do you think would be involved?
 
bustaheims said:
I think the only way it works is the exceptionally rare 3 team deal. So, you know, not happening and all.

It's not really a 3-way trade since all 3 teams wouldn't be dealing with each other. It'd just be Dubas talking to 2 GMs at the same time. I guess to make it simpler the Leafs would be dangling their 2021 1st round pick while acquiring someone elses 1st rounder for Andersen to replace that. I don't really think that's out of the realm of possibility. It'd be no different than the Leafs signing Pietrangelo or Brodie and having deals in place with other teams to make the necessary cap clearing moves afterward.
 
Guilt Trip said:
Makes sense. I was just looking at it from a cash savings and didn't consider their loss of picks.

Arizona also seems to like Hill. He had good numbers last season while they ran into injuries and they just signed him to a 1-way contract. Raanta's injury history would mean they'd need to beef up their 3rd goalie position but I think they'd be comfortable with that pair considering the circumstances.
 
Guilt Trip said:
That could happen. Leafs actually had Lehner at the deadline last year lol. Let's say it's possible. What team do you think would be involved?

That's where things get complicated. The teams that might be willing to move a 1st round pick to Arizona to get Andersen from Toronto are hard to identify. There aren't any obvious ones that I don't see waiting to at least check on the UFA market.
 
Buffalo and Carolina are both teams that jump out at me that would probably be very interested in a $5mil goalie who only costs $1mil.

Buffalo's pick would of course need to be lottery protected, or we'd need to take a pair of 2nds or something instead considering where their 1sts might be in the next couple of years.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Guilt Trip said:
Makes sense. I was just looking at it from a cash savings and didn't consider their loss of picks.

Arizona also seems to like Hill. He had good numbers last season while they ran into injuries and they just signed him to a 1-way contract. Raanta's injury history would mean they'd need to beef up their 3rd goalie position but I think they'd be comfortable with that pair considering the circumstances.
That's right. I forgot about them signing him to a one way deal. Oh and I didn't think you said Anderson and a 1st.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top