• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2020-2021 Toronto Maple Leafs General Discussion

The back to backs are nice. I wonder if the league will try to include more home-and-home sets for divisional matchups moving forward, when (if?) they can get back to a more traditional schedule.
 
Arn said:
I'm kinda liking the structure of this season, 2 games v Edmonton, then 2 v Calgary, 2 more v Edmonton again, 3 v Vancouver coming up.

Not sure if I'd buy into it long term but it's fun for something different.
If anything it's exciting to be all Canada all the time. I really appreciate the prolonged look at Canada's western teams. We don't get to see them enough with regional restrictions and late time zones.
 
We have it quite a lot in the British league which is an 8 team league playing 56 games so similar set up to this year's Canadian division. We get it even more so in Belfast as we're the only "overseas" team so we tend to get quite a few home or away double header weekends. They work out great here as it means away fans are more likely to come over to Belfast for 2 games which boosts the atmosphere and equally it's a good excuse for us to hop across the water for a weekend in Cardiff or Glasgow or wherever.

It also definitely adds to the rivalry and you can have niggly little confrontations build up over the couple of games (as we saw with Muzzin and Tkachuk last night I feel  ;D )
 
Yes - that's actually probably the main reason for the Belfast double headers, one set of flights to and from Belfast rather than two and a hotel stay you'd be having anyway so I'd say it's bound to.

If the divisions go back to the original alignment maybe they'll juggle the number of  games in and out of division as well going forward?
 
Nik said:
I wonder if this saves the teams money travel-wise. If so, we may see it stick around.

The Athletic did a mock schedule for something like this a couple years ago, at the time dubbed the Toews Schedule. Under their version they said NHL teams would fly 291,020 fewer miles.
 
Arn said:
Yes - that's actually probably the main reason for the Belfast double headers, one set of flights to and from Belfast rather than two and a hotel stay you'd be having anyway so I'd say it's bound to.

If the divisions go back to the original alignment maybe they'll juggle the number of  games in and out of division as well going forward?

Could be. I wonder if the trade-off is that it might be harder to sell tickets to two games in a row against a less exciting opponent than spacing things out. Be interesting to see how it shakes out.
 
Nik said:
Could be. I wonder if the trade-off is that it might be harder to sell tickets to two games in a row against a less exciting opponent than spacing things out. Be interesting to see how it shakes out.

That did seem to be the main pushback from teams and the league in that article I mentioned. And teams want games against the McDavid/Matthews/Crosby's of the league more spread out in their schedule. I'm not sure that makes sense but the NHL's popularity does have the momentum of a runaway freight train so who are we to question their marketing geniuses.
 
Nik said:
Arn said:
Yes - that's actually probably the main reason for the Belfast double headers, one set of flights to and from Belfast rather than two and a hotel stay you'd be having anyway so I'd say it's bound to.

If the divisions go back to the original alignment maybe they'll juggle the number of  games in and out of division as well going forward?

Could be. I wonder if the trade-off is that it might be harder to sell tickets to two games in a row against a less exciting opponent than spacing things out. Be interesting to see how it shakes out.
PHX VS ANH last night... 1-0. Big rematch Thursday, good luck selling tickets to that game.

I am thankful that I look forward to all the North opponents.
 
Campbell out for weeks, are these weeks on earth, like how many or are these weeks on Jupiter or Neptune? It's like they want us to be ignorant that this could end up like 6 weeks or 8 weeks instead of 2 months.
Yes we know Hutch is our backup.  And we know how to hold our breath for 2 1/2 hours at time.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Nik said:
Could be. I wonder if the trade-off is that it might be harder to sell tickets to two games in a row against a less exciting opponent than spacing things out. Be interesting to see how it shakes out.

That did seem to be the main pushback from teams and the league in that article I mentioned. And teams want games against the McDavid/Matthews/Crosby's of the league more spread out in their schedule. I'm not sure that makes sense but the NHL's popularity does have the momentum of a runaway freight train so who are we to question their marketing geniuses.

Reducing the carbon footprint will soon overrule all these other considerations.  291k fewer airmiles is plenty of carbon averted.
 
Highlander said:
Campbell out for weeks, are these weeks on earth, like how many or are these weeks on Jupiter or Neptune? It's like they want us to be ignorant that this could end up like 6 weeks or 8 weeks instead of 2 months.
Yes we know Hutch is our backup.  And we know how to hold our breath for 2 1/2 hours at time.

Or maybe they don't know.

Or maybe they don't care if you have precise knowledge of when to expect him to be back.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Reducing the carbon footprint will soon overrule all these other considerations.  291k fewer airmiles is plenty of carbon averted.

You're a more optimistic man than I am if you think we're near a point where that will trump profitability for NHL owners.
 
Has anyone noticed Mikhayev has only 1pt in 8 games?

I feel like everyone's really focussed in on Vesey and, sure Mikhayev is more versatile, but wow, that is a bad start.
 
Bender said:
Has anyone noticed Mikhayev has only 1pt in 8 games?

I feel like everyone's really focussed in on Vesey and, sure Mikhayev is more versatile, but wow, that is a bad start.

He's fallen into the Grabner/Kapanen archetype of speedy players who get lots of chances but don't finish. His last season numbers suggest he can put up points so hopefully he starts getting some breaks.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Bender said:
Has anyone noticed Mikhayev has only 1pt in 8 games?

I feel like everyone's really focussed in on Vesey and, sure Mikhayev is more versatile, but wow, that is a bad start.

He's fallen into the Grabner/Kapanen archetype of speedy players who get lots of chances but don't finish. His last season numbers suggest he can put up points so hopefully he starts getting some breaks.

He did have a stretch last year from Oct 29 - December 12: 20GP 0G 7A Still getting assists but his goal scoring dried up pretty hard.

I think he has been somewhat unlucky a little bit with a few really good saves and just missing the top corner on shots but he seems to do the same move when he gets his breakaways so the book might be out on him a little bit in terms of how to defend a Mikheyev breakaway.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
He's fallen into the Grabner/Kapanen archetype of speedy players who get lots of chances but don't finish. His last season numbers suggest he can put up points so hopefully he starts getting some breaks.

That, and he hasn't been playing on a line that's expected to shoulder a significant amount of the offensive load. His speed has made him a tremendously effective penalty killer, and the offence will come. He's getting too many opportunities for some of them to not eventually find the back of the net. He's also less of a straight line player than Kapanen, which also suggests he'll be more successful as the season progresses.
 
Bender said:
Has anyone noticed Mikhayev has only 1pt in 8 games?

I feel like everyone's really focussed in on Vesey and, sure Mikhayev is more versatile, but wow, that is a bad start.
Has anyone said how bad Hyman's been because he has the same amount of even strength  points? Hyman is the worst player, that has a point, on the team for ES Points/60 mins and keep in mind he was getting shifts with the top 2 lines, Mikheyev wasn't until last night.
Oh and add in JT because he has 2 ESPs, both assists. Willy has 3 ESPs and hasn't scored in 7 games.
Mikheyev brings a lot more to the table defensively then Vesey and this year I think he's actually our best defensive player. The points will come because he's getting chances.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Bender said:
Has anyone noticed Mikhayev has only 1pt in 8 games?

I feel like everyone's really focussed in on Vesey and, sure Mikhayev is more versatile, but wow, that is a bad start.

He's fallen into the Grabner/Kapanen archetype of speedy players who get lots of chances but don't finish. His last season numbers suggest he can put up points so hopefully he starts getting some breaks.

Hess also coming back from an extremely serious injury to his hand.  Doesn't affect his legs.  A larger sample size is warranted
 
wnc096 said:
CarltonTheBear said:
Bender said:
Has anyone noticed Mikhayev has only 1pt in 8 games?

I feel like everyone's really focussed in on Vesey and, sure Mikhayev is more versatile, but wow, that is a bad start.

He's fallen into the Grabner/Kapanen archetype of speedy players who get lots of chances but don't finish. His last season numbers suggest he can put up points so hopefully he starts getting some breaks.

Hess also coming back from an extremely serious injury to his hand.  Doesn't affect his legs.  A larger sample size is warranted
A bad start is a bad start. How can you have a large sample at the "start"?
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top