• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

General Leafs Talk

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, it feels like a one-sided rumour: I'm sure Edmonton would like Phaneuf, but I don't see what's in it for the Leafs.  I don't see a deal here.
 
KadriFan said:
With his contract I would guess not much. 

I agree, however they have stockpiled some nice prospects over the last number of years...

I honestly don't think Phaneuf will see another NHL contract like this ever again, but he is an asset to any team. If you're part of the Oilers brass, and need a guy to fill that Mentor role on the ice, why not trade for someone who is co-incidentally born in your city..  and has just gotten married to someone born in Alberta, and played for your arch provincial rival.. why not??

 
Stickytape said:
Yeah, it feels like a one-sided rumour: I'm sure Edmonton would like Phaneuf, but I don't see what's in it for the Leafs.  I don't see a deal here.

Toronto really needs to give up wingers and add solid top-4 defenders/top centers.  So if Edmonton is in to giving us RNH for Phaneuf then yippee!  But I don't see that happening soon.
 
Green Leaf said:
I agree, however they have stockpiled some nice prospects over the last number of years...

They have some nice prospects, but, other than the guys who have already made their roster, they don't really have any centrepiece type prospects, and, outside of Yakupov, the roster players they'd likely be willing to move really don't make up for that.
 
bustaheims said:
Green Leaf said:
I agree, however they have stockpiled some nice prospects over the last number of years...

They have some nice prospects, but, other than the guys who have already made their roster, they don't really have any centrepiece type prospects, and, outside of Yakupov, the roster players they'd likely be willing to move really don't make up for that.

If I'm Nonis and I have an idea of what he's looking for term and $ wise on an extension he's either signed or traded before the season starts.

If it looks as if he won't be staying, I'd even consider moving him for Nurse and next years 1st, if they'd be willing to make the deal. That or Yakupov, but he wouldn't be cheap as he means enough to this team and could still be dealt at the deadline.
 
bustaheims said:
Green Leaf said:
I agree, however they have stockpiled some nice prospects over the last number of years...

They have some nice prospects, but, other than the guys who have already made their roster, they don't really have any centrepiece type prospects, and, outside of Yakupov, the roster players they'd likely be willing to move really don't make up for that.

I had a Leaf fan friend yesterday tell me that Nonis will indeed trade Phaneuf, I asked him to explain, but he didn't have time. He said that the Leafs want Franson to be the #1 and that they were actively shopping Dion. He has friends in the league, such as Steve Walkom, but I just can't believe that the Leafs are shopping him, rather than just listening to other teams as stated before.

Why does it keep coming up? I also agree with most, that we wouldn't really get what we should from Edmonton. If the Leafs wanted to trade Dion, they would put it out to the media that the top bid wins.

We'd also have to get a very good young defender back in the deal, preferably one that plays the right side. I don't see it and hope that they negotiate a smaller deal for Phaneuf and continue to let him do what he's been doing, as I think he's a good defender. I seem to be in the minority though sometimes.
 
BlueWhiteBlood said:
Why does it keep coming up? I also agree with most, that we wouldn't really get what we should from Edmonton. If the Leafs wanted to trade Dion, they would put it out to the media that the top bid wins.

Well, firstly, you have to remember the the majority of the "Leafs shopping Phaneuf" stuff isn't exactly coming from the most reliable of sources. Even your friend who has connections seems a little fishy to me. I don't believe for a second the team wants Franson to be the #1. Doesn't pass the smell test. Secondly, considering the sources it's coming from, you have to look at why they'd say something like that, and really, it comes down to two things. Firstly, Leafs rumours bring traffic and, secondly, a good chunk of Leafs fans have a negative view towards Phaneuf right now. That, combined with it being Nonis' first offseason with the Leafs, rumours of him being very active on the trade market, etc, and Dion being in the last year of his contract, it's sort of the perfect storm for this kind of stuff to keep popping up from people who want to be heard but really have nothing useful to say.

Just one thing, though - if the Leafs were shopping Phaneuf, they wouldn't put it out to the media. In the early stages of things, that hurts their bargaining position. You don't want teams to believe you're actively looking to move the guy unless you desperately want to be rid of him. What they'd do is they'd contact teams that have significant pieces they're interested in and try to start a dialogue. Things might leak out to the media, but, not until the process has gotten underway or the team has informed the other 29 teams they're looking to move him. The whole "negotiate through the media" stuff is overblown.
 
bustaheims said:
I don't believe for a second the team wants Franson to be the #1. Doesn't pass the smell test.

Well, this is what got me fired up also. I said that Franson is not yet ready to become that kind of defenseman. He may be in the future, but he can't play good enough defensive hockey for that IMO.

Just one thing, though - if the Leafs were shopping Phaneuf, they wouldn't put it out to the media. In the early stages of things, that hurts their bargaining position. You don't want teams to believe you're actively looking to move the guy unless you desperately want to be rid of him. What they'd do is they'd contact teams that have significant pieces they're interested in and try to start a dialogue. Things might leak out to the media, but, not until the process has gotten underway or the team has informed the other 29 teams they're looking to move him. The whole "negotiate through the media" stuff is overblown.

And that's why I said that, because Nonis has already stated the generic "we'll listen to all offers and if it helps improve our team, we'll consider it", after already saying that he doesn't see the captain being traded.

If it keeps popping up, you'd think the Leafs really do want to "get rid of" Phaneuf. Either way, I don't think the Leafs are unhappy with Phaneuf and I still think they will try to sign him on a cheaper long term deal.

If Phaneuf leaves Toronto this summer or at the deadline, I believe it will be of Phaneuf's own aspirations. That's just a hunch, but I don't buy all the negativity about Phaneuf's game. He's a top pairing guy!
 
If Nonis is about my stealth rebuild there are trades that could jump start that process(although would be of terrible value for Edmonton). If, say, they wanted to deal one of Hall or Eberle or RNH and Justin Schultz or Nurse and then Kessel could be flipped to somewhere like Nashville for something like Seth Jones and Colin Wilson....I mean, none of those deals are fair deals for the non-Maple Leafs but you could talk me into them.
 
If the team "wanted Franson to be a #1" they would just play him 25+ minutes a game like Phaneuf, wouldn't they?  Since they didn't play him as much as Phaneuf, I've got to believe they just don't think he's as good.
 
Nik the Trik said:
If Nonis is about my stealth rebuild there are trades that could jump start that process(although would be of terrible value for Edmonton). If, say, they wanted to deal one of Hall or Eberle or RNH and Justin Schultz or Nurse and then Kessel could be flipped to somewhere like Nashville for something like Seth Jones and Colin Wilson....I mean, none of those deals are fair deals for the non-Maple Leafs but you could talk me into them.

Well, he kind of killed your theory when he signed Clarkson for 7 years IMO.
 
princedpw said:
If the team "wanted Franson to be a #1" they would just play him 25+ minutes a game like Phaneuf, wouldn't they?  Since they didn't play him as much as Phaneuf, I've got to believe they just don't think he's as good.

I don't think that is accurate, nor what the Leafs believe either. They gave him more minutes last season and he responded, but that doesn't mean that he's ready or not ready for big defensive minutes. I think he will be closer to playing top pairing minutes this coming season, certainly with the extra PP time he'll get, but he isn't quite their defensively from what I can see.
 
Nik the Trik said:
BlueWhiteBlood said:
Well, he kind of killed your theory when he signed Clarkson for 7 years IMO.

That sort of depends on how good you think Clarkson is.

You mean that he'll be productive at the end of the deal when the rebuilt is ready to compete? Or that Nonis is speeding the process by signing UFA busts?
 
Nik the Trik said:
BlueWhiteBlood said:
Well, he kind of killed your theory when he signed Clarkson for 7 years IMO.

That sort of depends on how good you think Clarkson is.

It was mostly in jest, but Clarkson is what, 29? If you're rebuilding, you'd think he'd sign a core young guy to that kind of term. But, I suppose you could still be right, maybe.
 
mr grieves said:
Nik the Trik said:
BlueWhiteBlood said:
Well, he kind of killed your theory when he signed Clarkson for 7 years IMO.

That sort of depends on how good you think Clarkson is.

You mean that he'll be productive at the end of the deal when the rebuilt is ready to compete? Or that Nonis is speeding the process by signing UFA busts?

I mean he's the kind of player who, while he can contribute a lot of good and necessary things to a mostly young team, isn't by himself good enough to lift them out of the cellar.
 
BlueWhiteBlood said:
Nik the Trik said:
BlueWhiteBlood said:
Well, he kind of killed your theory when he signed Clarkson for 7 years IMO.

That sort of depends on how good you think Clarkson is.

It was mostly in jest, but Clarkson is what, 29? If you're rebuilding, you'd think he'd sign a core young guy to that kind of term. But, I suppose you could still be right, maybe.

I can't speak to Nik's point, but IMO guys with Clarkson's type of game aren't on the market all that often.

Trading Phaneuf for 1 of the Oilers young guys (RNH, Yak or Schultz/Nurse) and moving Kessel for Jones + would be amazing. The young players plus the cap space for the UFA/RFA market would be exactly the type of thing this, or any, franchise should be after. Realistically we have too many wingers anyway.

I don't think I could be more excited about an idea, which is why I don't see it happening.

Lupul -  Wilson - Clarkson
JVR -  Kadri - Yakupov
Kulemin- Bozak - Bolland
Orr - McClement - McLaren

Franson - Gardiner
Liles - Jones
Gunnar - Fraser/Holzer

In the wings: Rielly

Guys who could be moved: Colborne, Liles, Fraser, Holzer, Bozak, Bolland

Not including Jones' salary and assuming generous salaries for Franson (3.5M), Kadri (4M), Gunnar (2.5) and Fraser (1M), that's a team that comes in at 55.5M giving them loads of flexibility moving forward and some pretty high ceiling players.

While not a perfect roster, there's enough money for a #1C or a very good D man. Liles and Bozak are both movable, bigger cap hit players. The 3rd line is the perfect 3rd line IMO.

A man can dream...
 
BlueWhiteBlood said:
It was mostly in jest, but Clarkson is what, 29? If you're rebuilding, you'd think he'd sign a core young guy to that kind of term.

I don't see how it's an either/or sort of thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top